- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:57:34 -0400
- To: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- CC: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Robin Berjon wrote: >> * Test failures in a given implementation caused by the lack of support >> for a particular feature of an independent specification are not >> counted. ... > Out of curiosity, why not make it two interoperable implementations of > *all* the tests, except those stemming from a lack of support for CSS? I should note that if we consider WebIDL an "independent specification" then we're already there. -Boris
Received on Friday, 19 June 2009 14:59:37 UTC