RE: Widgets 1.0 Packaging and Configuration: I18N comments...

Hi Marcos,

(chair hat OFF)

I share your concern about the processing model, which is why I asked to see the document. I think having the design right is key to making the spec successful.

I'll take a look at your documents below and send comments along. What you're struggling with here is not unusual and, in fact, there are different views on the best methodology and approach. See, for example, the myriad (competing) ways of localizing a J2EE application :-).

Addison

Addison Phillips
Globalization Architect -- Lab126

Internationalization is not a feature.
It is an architecture.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marcos Caceres [mailto:marcosc@opera.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 8:03 AM
> To: Phillips, Addison
> Cc: public-i18n-core@w3.org; public-webapps@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Widgets 1.0 Packaging and Configuration: I18N
> comments...
> 
> Hi Addison,
> 
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Phillips, Addison
> <addison@amazon.com> wrote:
> > Hello Webapps,
> >
> > Thanks for the response. Is there is a new draft or editor's copy
> where these changes are made?
> 
> Yes, see [1]; but we are still working out the details. As this
> change
> caused some radical changes in the spec, I am still working out how
> to
> make the processing model work. I'm currently working on a separate
> document that outlines the complete solution for discussion [2]. I
> can
> send it to i18n for discussion once I'm done writing it. I would
> prefer to have consensus on a solution before I add anything else
> to
> the spec.
> 
> Kind regards,
> Marcos
> 
> [1] http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/

> [2] (unfinished draft!)
> http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/i18n.html

> --
> Marcos Caceres
> http://datadriven.com.au

Received on Friday, 3 April 2009 15:20:22 UTC