Re: Storage 'length' and enumeration

On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:51:33 +0200, John J Barton  
<johnjbarton@johnjbarton.com> wrote:
> Yes and Firebug has to have special code for HTMLCollection because this  
> mistake
> was made in the past. Now we will have to have different special code for
> Storage. Rather than modeling new API on old mistakes, consider learning  
> from the past experience and take a direction that developers will find  
> less
> confusing. Pseudo-arrays with "except... this and that" makes APIs  
> intricate and
> puzzling. A simpler and less ambiguous approach would be better in my  
> opinion.

Is there any type of object that holds a collection that does not use  
.length? Seems a bit weird to break consistency here in my opinion.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/

Received on Wednesday, 29 April 2009 21:41:09 UTC