- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 10:16:14 -0400
- To: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
The draft minutes from the June 25 Widgets Security voice conference
are available at the following and copied below:
<http://www.w3.org/2009/05/25-wam-minutes.html>
WG Members - if you have any comments, corrections, etc., please send
them to the public-webapps mail list before 2 July 2009 (the next
Widgets voice conference); otherwise these minutes will be considered
Approved.
-Regards, Art Barstow
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
- DRAFT -
Widgets Voice Conference
25 Jun 2009
[2]Agenda
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/
2009AprJun/1217.html
See also: [3]IRC log
[3] http://www.w3.org/2009/06/25-wam-irc
Attendees
Present
Art, Robin, Jere, Marcin, Mike, David
Regrets
Thomas, Frederick, Marcos, Arve
Chair
Art
Scribe
Art
Contents
* [4]Topics
1. [5]Review and tweak agenda
2. [6]Announcements
3. [7]P+C comments from Dom, Francois and Opera
4. [8]Comments from Josh
5. [9]A&E spec
6. [10]Widgets Update spec & the PAG
7. [11]AOB
* [12]Summary of Action Items
_________________________________________________________
<scribe> ScribeNick: ArtB
<scribe> Scribe: Art
Date: 25 June 2009
Review and tweak agenda
AB: I submitted a draft agenda on June 24 (
[13]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009AprJun/12
17.html ). I will combine some of the P&C comments i.e. take 3a-3d
together and 3e-3h together. Any change requests?
... given Marcos' absence today, we will defer detailed discussion
of P+C LC comments
... any change requests?
[13] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/
2009AprJun/1217.html
[ None ]
Announcements
AB: does anyone have any short announcements?
[ None ]
P+C comments from Dom, Francois and Opera
AB: there is still no response to the four sets of comments from
Dom, Francois, Opera and Dom (again)
... Comments from Dom Hazael-Massieux (12 June and 15 June)
...
[14]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009AprJun/09
36.html
...
[15]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009AprJun/09
71.html
... Comments from Francois Daoust (14 June)
...
[16]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009AprJun/09
62.html
... Comments from Opera (15 June; submitted by Marcos)
...
[17]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009AprJun/09
75.html
... Comments from Dom Hazael-Massieux (17 June)
...
[18]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009AprJun/10
21.html
... I want to remind everyone: a) we have an obligation to respond
to every comment; b) we cannot proceed with a request to Candidate
until we have responded to all comments and every comment is
recorded in the tracking doc (
[19]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/42538/WD-widgets-2
0090528/ )
... any comments?
[14] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/
2009AprJun/0936.html
[15] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/
2009AprJun/0971.html
[16] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/
2009AprJun/0962.html
[17] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/
2009AprJun/0975.html
[18] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/
2009AprJun/1021.html
[19] http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/42538/WD-
widgets-20090528/
[ None ]
Comments from Josh
AB: on June 18 Josh submitted four sets of comments
...
[20]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009AprJun/10
96.html
...
[21]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009AprJun/10
97.html
...
[22]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009AprJun/11
01.html
...
[23]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009AprJun/11
02.html
... of course we must also respond to all of these comments and
please do so on the public mail list
... any comments?
[20] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/
2009AprJun/1096.html
[21] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/
2009AprJun/1097.html
[22] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/
2009AprJun/1101.html
[23] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/
2009AprJun/1102.html
[ None ]
JK: there could be some substantial comments in there
... but most seem to be editorial
AB: any last comments on P+C spec?
JK: would be good if MC would sift out those that need discussion
... and the editorial ones he can just resolve
AB: that's a good idea
... and we can hot topics to next week's agenda
A&E spec
AB: the basic discussion points are what is the status of the A&E
spec and what are the plans for publishing the LCWD? Latest ED is (
[24]http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-api/ )
... Arve and Marcos aren't here
... Robin, did you agree to be extra editor?
[24] http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-api/
RB: I am happy to do so
<scribe> ACTION: barstow decide if Robin should be added as an
Editor of the A+E spec [recorded in
[25]http://www.w3.org/2009/06/25-wam-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-372 - Decide if Robin should be added as
an Editor of the A+E spec [on Arthur Barstow - due 2009-07-02].
AB: any comments on A+E?
RB: don't think there is much left before we move on with it
... most of the changes we agreed to during our last f2f are already
done
... but a few things are missing
... showNot is now marked as risk
... but I should talk to Arve and MC before making any changes
<Marcos> ahi
DR: need to update P+C refs
RB: yes; correct
AB: any other comments?
... so general action for all wg members to review latest ED and
submit comments
Widgets Update spec & the PAG
AB: the Widgets Update PAG's Charter (
[26]http://www.w3.org/2009/03/widgets-pag-charter.html ) was
extended until the end of September. The PAG continues to have
weekly conference calls and there will be two more calls before the
calls are suspended for 3-4 weeks due to summer holidays.
... the call for prior art resulted in several responses (
[27]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-widgets-pag/ ).
[26] http://www.w3.org/2009/03/widgets-pag-charter.html
[27] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-widgets-pag/
RB: how committed is the PAG to circumvention vs. prior art?
AB: both tracks are being pursued
AOB
AB: I don't have anything specific
... anyone else?
<fjh> other than that it seems ok or do you have another CVS
location to use?
<Marcos> fjh, MikeSmith: thanks for taking care of this!
AB: Meeting Adjourned
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: barstow decide if Robin should be added as an Editor
of the A+E spec [recorded in
[28]http://www.w3.org/2009/06/25-wam-minutes.html#action01]
[End of minutes]
Received on Thursday, 25 June 2009 14:17:07 UTC