- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 13:32:09 +0200
- To: marcosc@opera.com
- Cc: Arve Bersvendsen <arveb@opera.com>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
On 24 Apr 2009, at 13:19, Marcos Caceres wrote: >> We need to figure out what the baseline policy is for access to >> persistent >> storage that is shared across several instances, or even several >> widgets. > Agreed. We are unsure if that goes into our spec or into the > WebStorage spec. I suspect there is a piece of it that ought to go into the Widget spec. >> The current approach simply means that there is no shared, >> persistent >> storage in the widget model; that's probably isn't what people >> desire. > > "the current approach" meaning what is currently specified in the A&E > spec, right? It means what's currently in the web storage spec, and what's in every way to construct an origin for a widget that I've seen -- whether it's Arve's approach with the widget:// scheme (and some random string in it, per instance), or my proposal of simply going for a random string.
Received on Friday, 24 April 2009 11:32:24 UTC