- From: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:22:49 +0200
- To: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Jun 19, 2009, at 17:14 , Lachlan Hunt wrote:
> Robin Berjon wrote:
>> Out of curiosity, why not make it two interoperable implementations
>> of
>> *all* the tests, except those stemming from a lack of support for
>> CSS?
>
> I was advised to set the requirements low so that it would be easier
> to proceed past CR. With these requirements, we can get past CR
> relatively quickly. If we need to wait for at least 2
> implementations that both get 100%, that will just delay the spec by
> 6 to 12 months awaiting the browser vendors' next release cycle.
I don't have a strong opinion either way, but I am unaware of any
external time pressure on this specification. If there aren't any, why
not delay it so we can do the hard (and right) thing of only shipping
when we have fully demonstrated interoperability?
--
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/
Feel like hiring me? Go to http://robineko.com/
Received on Friday, 19 June 2009 15:23:22 UTC