- From: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:55:51 +0200
- To: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org> wrote: >> Hi Frederick, >> Some tiny editorial changes.... >> >> I think we should add the following sub-section to the Status of This >> Document: >> >> [[ >> <h3 class="no-num no-toc">Note to Last Call Reviewers</h3> >> <p><em>This section is non-normative.</em></p> >> <p>The editors of this specification respond rapidly to all feedback >> and continuously make corrections to this document. Unless you are >> reading this document on the date of publication, <strong >> class="redNote">it is extremely likely that this document has been >> superseded</strong>. Instead of reviewing this published draft, please >> review the <a href="http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-digsig/">latest >> editor's draft</a> and make sure to cite the date of that draft in the >> feedback sent to the Web Apps Working Group's public mailing list <a >> href= >> "mailto:public-webapps@w3.org">public-Webapps@w3.org</a>. </p> >> <p>Please also be sure to check the mailing list <a href= >> "http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/">archive</a> to >> see if any issues uncovered have already been addressed. To help with >> cataloging issues, prefix emails to the mailing list with the string >> <samp>[widgets]</samp>. Any and all feedback is welcomed.</p> >> ]] > > Well... Doesn't "Last Call" suggest that you're actually beyond the phase of > rapid changes? LOL! hell no, that's when most changes happen because it's the only time people pay enough attention to do an actual review. That's why Last Call should really be called "First Call" :) Kind regards, Marcos -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Wednesday, 29 April 2009 11:57:03 UTC