W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2009

Re: Request for Comments: FPWD of Widgets 1.0: URI Scheme spec

From: mozer <xmlizer@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:02:12 +0200
Message-ID: <21d9ade60906190102u15efad98nf6ec5b79faf4ac64@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>

Very interesting part of the whole Widget Sorcery

Here are few comments

1) In the same spirit as WARP, it would be interesting to make HTML5
reference, an informative one

2) Probably the link between authority and opaque-autorithy should be clearer

3) Update reference to Working Draft 28 May 2009 for Widgets-PC

4) s/RFC5234/RFC 5234/

I'm not sure to fully understand this requirement

Must be independent of any file system
Addressing based on this scheme must only map onto Zip relative paths
and remain independent of any file system on which the widget may be

Does it mean that, it is case insensitive for example ?


On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Arthur Barstow<art.barstow@nokia.com> wrote:
> To: public-webapps@w3.org
> BCC: www-tag@w3.org, public-pkg-uri-scheme@w3.org
> Reply-to: public-webapps@w3.org
> On June 18, the Web Applications WG published a First Public Working Draft
> of the Widgets 1.0: URI Scheme spec:
> [[
> <http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-widgets-uri-20090618/>
> Abstract
> Many specifications in the Web stack depend on a context being defined that
> includes a current URI. This is easily provided for documents retrieved over
> HTTP, or from the local file system, but is currently undefined for
> documents extracted from within a widget package. Such a limitation has a
> number of implications which this document intends to address.
> Introduction
> This specification defines the widget URI scheme for use inside widgets or
> other such applications of web technology that do not run on the web.
> ]]
> If you have any comments, please send them to public-webapps@w3.org.
> -Regards, Art Barstow
> P.S. BCC was used for TAG and PKG-URI mail lists to reduce cross-posting
Received on Friday, 19 June 2009 08:02:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:12:54 UTC