- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 20:00:20 +1000
- To: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
- Cc: Marcin Hanclik <Marcin.Hanclik@access-company.com>, public-webapps@w3.org
Marcin Hanclik: > > I have reviewed a few recommendations from http://www.w3.org/TR/. > > a) SVGT1.2 http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-SVGTiny12-20081222/ says: > > "Future versions of this specification will maintain backwards > > compatibility with previous versions of the language" SVGT1.2 uses > > version attribute to describe the version of the standard that > > was used to write the SVG document. They also use "baseProfile" > > as a further means for content versioning/requirements in > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-SVGTiny12-20081222/single-page.html#implnote-VersionControl. Just to be clear, version="" and baseProfile="" in SVG Tiny 1.2 are used only as a hint from the content author as to what minimum version of the language is required for the content to work properly. No difference in processing is required for differently specified version="" and baseProfile="" attributes. -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/
Received on Monday, 1 June 2009 10:01:32 UTC