- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 23:54:44 -0700
- To: Darin Adler <darin@apple.com>, public-webapps@w3.org
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Cameron McCormack<cam@mcc.id.au> wrote: > Darin Adler: >> What about too many arguments, and ignoring extra ones? Is that >> settled? > > It seems consistent with current implementations to ignore extra > arguments. That approach might go against the desire to maximise the > freedom API designers have to add additional overloaded operations > later, though. Yeah, ideally I would want to treat too many arguments the same as too few. However I'm more concerned about breaking existing content here if all commonly used UAs consistently ignore them. I would be willing to give it a try though, or at least once I've checked with the appropriate people that that is easily testable in gecko. / Jonas
Received on Friday, 26 June 2009 06:55:46 UTC