- From: Arthur Barstow <Art.Barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 06:58:17 -0400
- To: ext Kai Hendry <hendry@aplix.co.jp>, "Hirsch Frederick (Nokia-CIC/Boston)" <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
- Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Kai, Frederick, On May 7, 2009, at 10:35 AM, Hirsch Frederick (Nokia-CIC/Boston) wrote: > I assume this issue is closed with no need to add this text, given the > subsequent thread. If this is incorrect please note that on the list. I think this is not correct. My interpretation of Kai's response of: [[ <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009AprJun/ 0496.html> Ok, I'm fine with Frederick's response. Thank you, ]] was an indication that he agreed with Frederick's proposal to add the qualification: [[ <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009AprJun/ 0477.html> We can add, "A signer MUST place the dsp:Identifier signature property into the signature when generating the signature." if necessary. ]] Kai - please clarify your position. -Regards, Art Barstow > > Thanks > > regards, Frederick > > Frederick Hirsch > Nokia > > > > On May 5, 2009, at 6:33 AM, Barstow Art (Nokia-CIC/Boston) wrote: > >> On May 4, 2009, at 10:13 AM, Hirsch Frederick (Nokia-CIC/Boston) >> wrote: >> >>> We can add, "A signer MUST place the dsp:Identifier signature >>> property >>> into the signature when generating the signature." if necessary. >> >> This seems like a reasonable way to address Kai's question. >> >> Kai - please let us know if Frederick's proposal is acceptable. >> >> -Regards, Art Barstow >> >> >>>> On May 1, 2009, at 6:49 AM, ext Kai Hendry wrote: >>>> >>>>> http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-digsig/#identifier-signature- >>>>> property >>>>> >>>>> I'm not sure what "signature management" is exactly, though can >>>>> someone please inform me what a UA is supposed to do with >>>>> dsp:Identifier? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I'm also keen on seeing a simple self sign sign/verify example >>>>> using >>>>> http://www.aleksey.com/xmlsec/ or some other opensource tool. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Kind regards, >> >
Received on Friday, 8 May 2009 11:00:09 UTC