- From: Priestley, Mark, VF-Group <Mark.Priestley@vodafone.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:20:47 +0200
- To: <marcosc@opera.com>, "Frederick Hirsch" <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
- Cc: "Web Applications Working Group WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>
"I would like to see some text cautioning authors not to rely on this algorithm, since it is optional in user agents." Agreed - in fact I think a general statement about use of optional algorithms would be beneficial -----Original Message----- From: public-webapps-request@w3.org [mailto:public-webapps-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Marcos Caceres Sent: 24 April 2009 09:46 To: Frederick Hirsch Cc: Web Applications Working Group WG Subject: Re: [widget-digsig] Updated Widget Signature editors draft Hi Frederick, Thanks for updating the spec! comment below. On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 3:14 AM, Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com> wrote: > I have updated the Widget Signature draft to reflect decisions on > today's call, as follows: > > Added ECDSAwithSHA256 as SHOULD signature algorithm I would like to see some text cautioning authors not to rely on this algorithm, since it is optional in user agents. > Removed editor notes re feedback on signature algorithms Removed > editor note with Signature Properties reference, since we've removed > section 9 Added FIPS-186-3 reference > > http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-digsig/ > > Note that we will need to update the Signature Properties reference, > when that specification is published with this specification. > > regards, Frederick > > Frederick Hirsch > Nokia > > > > > -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Friday, 24 April 2009 09:24:49 UTC