- From: Nikunj R. Mehta <nikunj.mehta@oracle.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:18:39 -0700
- To: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Cc: arun@mozilla.com, public-webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, Jeff Mischkinsky <JEFF.MISCHKINSKY@oracle.com>
I have listed these requirements on my blog - http://o-micron.blogspot.com/2009/06/requirements-for-and-components-needed.html I will put these together in a forma suitable for W3C uses. Nikunj http://o-micron.blogspot.com On Jun 24, 2009, at 11:13 PM, Doug Schepers wrote: > Hi, Arun- > > Arun Ranganathan wrote (on 6/25/09 1:38 AM): >> >>>> On Jun 23, 2009, at 5:10 PM, Ian Hickson wrote: >>>>> The Web Storage specification is someone dead-locked right now due >>>>> to the lack of consensus on whether to use SQL or not. >> >> This topic continues to be discussed in Mozilla newsgroups. Few are >> reconciled to SQL usage: >> >> Example: >> http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.community.web-standards/topics >> >> Solutions such as BrowserCouch (which straddles localStorage >> currently) >> offer other options: http://www.toolness.com/wp/?p=580 >> >> I'd personally rather see a clear articulation of use cases that we >> agree are important for the web than further specification work. > > Actually, I think that's an excellent point. Nikunj, maybe that is > the next logical step? Could you take charge of that? > > Regards- > -Doug Schepers > W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs >
Received on Thursday, 25 June 2009 18:21:26 UTC