- From: Robert Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 12:31:03 -0400
- To: "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>
- Cc: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Bil Corry <bil@corry.biz>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, public-webapps@w3.org, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Sam Weinig <weinig@apple.com>
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 1:18 AM, Michael(tm) Smith <mike@w3.org> wrote: > Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, 2009-04-06 11:19 +0200: > >> (The http-wg discussion looked ill-informed; among other things, they didn't >> understand the relationship with CORS.) Why would they? The Origin header seems to be the solution to many problems. It's not obvious that it should be reused for each one. -- Robert Sayre "I would have written a shorter letter, but I did not have the time."
Received on Wednesday, 8 April 2009 16:31:44 UTC