- From: Arthur Barstow <Art.Barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 12:34:09 -0400
- To: "ext Nikunj R. Mehta" <nikunj.mehta@oracle.com>
- Cc: public-webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>, Jeff Mischkinsky <JEFF.MISCHKINSKY@oracle.com>
Nikunj, All, Charles will respond separately regarding a way forward but I want to respond to the false accusation below. On Jun 24, 2009, at 8:13 PM, ext Nikunj R. Mehta wrote: > The WG chair went ahead with the publication of the Web Storage draft > overriding serious objections about it's direction and emphasis. The record actually shows Nikunj saying: [[ http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009AprJun/0145.html Oracle conditionally supports the publishing this draft as FPWD provided that the abstract is worded appropriately. ... Here's what Oracle would like to see in the abstract: This specification defines two APIs for persistent data storage in Web clients: one for accessing key-value pair data and another for accessing structured data. ]] Ian agreed [1] to make the requested change above (it is included in the FPWD [2]) and thus addressed the only concern you raised re publishing the FPWD. -Regards, Art Barstow [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009AprJun/ 0149.html [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-webstorage-20090423/
Received on Thursday, 25 June 2009 16:35:18 UTC