Re: Points of order on this WG

Nikunj, All,

Charles will respond separately regarding a way forward but I want to  
respond to the false accusation below.

On Jun 24, 2009, at 8:13 PM, ext Nikunj R. Mehta wrote:

> The WG chair went ahead with the publication of the Web Storage draft
> overriding serious objections about it's direction and emphasis.

The record actually shows Nikunj saying:

[[
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009AprJun/0145.html

Oracle conditionally supports the publishing this draft as FPWD
provided that the abstract is worded appropriately.

...

Here's what Oracle would like to see in the abstract:

This specification defines two APIs for persistent data storage in Web
clients: one for accessing key-value pair data and another for
accessing structured data.
]]

Ian agreed [1] to make the requested change above (it is included in  
the FPWD [2]) and thus addressed the only concern you raised re  
publishing the FPWD.

-Regards, Art Barstow

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009AprJun/ 
0149.html
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-webstorage-20090423/

Received on Thursday, 25 June 2009 16:35:18 UTC