- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 13:10:57 -0400
- To: ext Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
- Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Apr 6, 2009, at 6:46 AM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote: > I had a discussion with Anne on IRC about using the Storage interface > and XHR [1]. He recommended that we recommend support for Storage only > on user agents that support HTML5. With regards to XHR, the same > applies: it would be a property of the underlying document technology. > > So, proposal are: drop "Asynchronous HTTP Requests" requirement [2] > and > remove its support from Widgets 1.0: A&E. Regarding dropping XHR, Marcos and I chatted about this [1] and since none of the functionality in the A+E spec actually requires XRR, I agree with the proposal to remove the related statement in Section 3.1. Regarding the requirement ([2] below), I think it is a reasonable requirement for a Widget User Agent so I would keep it despite none of our existing specs in progress address it (ATM). -Regards, Art Barstow [1] http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/webapps/20090406 > For Storage, specify that only > HTML-aware UAs support Storage interface. > > Kind regards, > Marcos > > [1] http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/webapps/20090403#l-36 > [2] http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-reqs/#asynchronous-http- > requests >
Received on Monday, 6 April 2009 17:12:33 UTC