- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 10:48:46 +0200
- To: Arve Bersvendsen <arveb@opera.com>
- Cc: "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
The implication is twofold: 1. If widgets are to use one of these storage mechanisms, then we need to say what (instead of origin) the storage is scoped by, and how a widget acquires an instance. 2. As far as security policies are concerned, this suggests that we are acquiring an additional set of complexity earlier than I had thought. -- Thomas Roessler, W3C (mobile) <tlr@w3.org> On Apr 24, 2009, at 10:37, "Arve Bersvendsen" <arveb@opera.com> wrote: > On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:17:07 +0200, Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org> > wrote: > >> Guido Grassel is reminding me that the HTML5 storage API keys off >> origin. Thy means another wrinkle or the uri scheme/origin >> discussion. > > Note that only the instantiations of storage, through the > localStorage and sessionStorage, are using origin. The storage > interface itself does not, so I do not see any immediate > consequences with regards to preferences or any uri scheme discussion. > > -- > Arve Bersvendsen > > Opera Software ASA, http://www.opera.com/ >
Received on Friday, 24 April 2009 08:49:59 UTC