- From: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 11:01:02 +0200
- To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Arthur Barstow<art.barstow@nokia.com> wrote: > The comment period for the 30 April 2009 Widgets Digital Signature LCWD [1] > ended 1 June 2009. > > It appears the only changes between the latest ED [2] and the LCWD are > Editorial. It also appears no formal comments were submitted. Editors - > please confirm this. > > One of the next steps to move this spec to CR is to agree on the CR's Exit > Criteria. A strawman proposal (based on the Element Traversal CR) follows: > > [[ > This is the DD MMM 2009 Candidate Recommendation of the Widgets 1.0: Digital > Signature specification. W3C publishes a Candidate Recommendation to > indicate that the document is believed to be stable and to encourage > implementation by the developer community. The Web Applications (WebApps) > Working Group expects to request that the Director advance this document to > Proposed Recommendation once the Working Group has developed a comprehensive > Widgets 1.0: Digital Signature test suite, and demonstrated at least two > interoperable implementations for each test. The WebApps Working Group > expects to show these implementations by September 2009. The Working Group > does not plan to request to advance to Proposed Recommendation prior to 01 > September 2009. > ]] > Ok, SoTD has now been updated. I also made some tiny editorial changes, which can be viewed here: http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-digsig/Overview-diff.html I made the publication date the 12th of June... though that is highly optimistic :) Anyway, we can update that when we have a firm date. Kind regards, Marcos -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Monday, 8 June 2009 09:02:06 UTC