- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 09:54:36 +0200
- To: "Mark S. Miller" <erights@google.com>, "Jonas Sicking" <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Cc: "Tyler Close" <tyler.close@gmail.com>, "Adam Barth" <w3c@adambarth.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Tue, 09 Jun 2009 03:39:19 +0200, Mark S. Miller <erights@google.com> wrote: > This use-case was the motivation for ADsafe, though any of the JavaScript > sanitizers would do. > > Without some such sanitization technology, it remains unsafe to load > untrusted ads directly on your page. Adam and I are still arguing fine > points of just how unsafe, but there's no question that the answer is at > least "too unsafe". > > With GuestXMLHttpRequest, such sanitized ads could be allowed to call > home safely without being able to impersonate their containing page's origin. Why can such ads not be embedded using a seamless sandboxed <iframe> from HTML5? -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Tuesday, 9 June 2009 07:55:23 UTC