Adrian Walker
Alexander Garcia Castro
Alvaro Graves
Amrapali J Zaveri
Andrea Di Menna
Andrea Splendiani
Andreas Blumauer
Andreas Blumauer (Semantic Web Company)
Andy Seaborne
Andy Turner
Anna Lisa Gentile
Antoine Isaac
Axel Ngonga
Barry Norton
- Re: List membership - more women (Monday, 24 June)
- Re: The Great Public Linked Data Use Case Register for Non-Technical End User Applications (Monday, 24 June)
- Re: The Great Public Linked Data Use Case Register for Non-Technical End User Applications (Sunday, 23 June)
- Re: The Great Public Linked Data Use Case Register for Non-Technical End User Applications (Sunday, 23 June)
- Re: The Great Public Linked Data Use Case Register for Non-Technical End User Applications (Sunday, 23 June)
- Re: The Great Public Linked Data Use Case Register for Non-Technical End User Applications (Sunday, 23 June)
- Re: Linked Data discussions require better communication (Saturday, 22 June)
- Re: RDF, Linked Data etc : please ping me when it's over ... (Wednesday, 19 June)
- Re: RDF, Linked Data etc : please ping me when it's over ... (Wednesday, 19 June)
- Re: RDF, Linked Data etc : please ping me when it's over ... (Wednesday, 19 June)
- Re: 返: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF (Wednesday, 19 June)
- Re: 返: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF (Wednesday, 19 June)
- Monitoring subscribers on the list (Tuesday, 18 June)
- Re: The need for RDF in Linked Data (Monday, 17 June)
- Re: Linked Data in my Head (Monday, 17 June)
- Linked Data in my Head (Monday, 17 June)
- Re: The need for RDF in Linked Data (Monday, 17 June)
- Re: Representing NULL in RDF (Monday, 3 June)
- Re: Representing NULL in RDF (Monday, 3 June)
- Re: Representing NULL in RDF (Monday, 3 June)
Bernadette Hyland
Bernard Vatant
Bo Ferri
Bonnie MacKellar
Brian McBride
Christian Chiarcos
Christoph LANGE
Claus Stadler
Clement Jonquet
Courtney, Paul K.
Damian Steer
Dan Brickley
Danny Ayers
Dave Longley
Dave Reynolds
David Booth
- Re: What Does Point Number 3 of TimBL's Linked Data Mean? (Tuesday, 25 June)
- Re: What Does Point Number 3 of TimBL's Linked Data Mean? (Tuesday, 25 June)
- Re: What Does Point Number 3 of TimBL's Linked Data Mean? (Tuesday, 25 June)
- Re: List membership - more women (Monday, 24 June)
- Re: The Test of Independent Invention (was: What Does Point Number 3 of TimBL's Linked Data Mean?) (Monday, 24 June)
- Re: What Does Point Number 3 of TimBL's Linked Data Mean? (Saturday, 22 June)
- Re: Linked Data discussions require better communication (Saturday, 22 June)
- Re: What Does Point Number 3 of TimBL's Linked Data Mean? (Friday, 21 June)
- Re: Linked Data discussions require better communication (Friday, 21 June)
- Re: Linked Data discussions require better communication (Friday, 21 June)
- Re: Linked Data discussions require better communication (Thursday, 20 June)
- Re: Linked Data discussions require better communication (Thursday, 20 June)
- Re: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF (Thursday, 20 June)
- Re: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF (Thursday, 20 June)
- List etiquette [was Re: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF] (Wednesday, 19 June)
- Re: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF (Wednesday, 19 June)
- Re: Fwd: The need for RDF in Linked Data (Tuesday, 18 June)
- Re: 返: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF (Tuesday, 18 June)
- Re: 返: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF (Tuesday, 18 June)
- Re: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF (Tuesday, 18 June)
- Re: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF (Tuesday, 18 June)
- Fwd: The need for RDF in Linked Data (Monday, 17 June)
- Re: Ending the Linked Data debate -- PLEASE VOTE *NOW*! (Friday, 14 June)
- Re: Ending the Linked Data debate -- PLEASE VOTE *NOW*! (Thursday, 13 June)
- Ending the Linked Data debate -- PLEASE VOTE *NOW*! (Thursday, 13 June)
- Re: Representing NULL in RDF (Wednesday, 12 June)
- Re: Linked Stuff [was Re: RDF's challenge] (Wednesday, 12 June)
- Re: Linked Stuff [was Re: RDF's challenge] (Wednesday, 12 June)
- Re: Linked Stuff [was Re: RDF's challenge] (Wednesday, 12 June)
- Re: Linked Stuff [was Re: RDF's challenge] (Tuesday, 11 June)
- Re: Linked Stuff [was Re: RDF's challenge] (Tuesday, 11 June)
- Linked Stuff [was Re: RDF's challenge] (Tuesday, 11 June)
- Re: RDF's challenge (Tuesday, 11 June)
David Wood
- Re: Linked Data Glossary is published! (Thursday, 27 June)
- Re: Rendering RDF in interactive html forms (Wednesday, 26 June)
- Re: List membership - more women (Monday, 24 June)
- Re: New DBpedia Overview Article Available (Monday, 24 June)
- Re: New DBpedia Overview Article Available (Monday, 24 June)
- Re: Are Topic Maps Linked Data? (Sunday, 23 June)
- Re: What Does Point Number 3 of TimBL's Linked Data Mean? (Saturday, 22 June)
- Re: What Does Point Number 3 of TimBL's Linked Data Mean? (Saturday, 22 June)
- Re: What Does Point Number 3 of TimBL's Linked Data Mean? (Saturday, 22 June)
- Re: What Does Point Number 3 of TimBL's Linked Data Mean? (Friday, 21 June)
- Re: The need for RDF in Linked Data (Monday, 17 June)
- Re: RDF's challenge (Tuesday, 11 June)
- Re: Representing NULL in RDF (Monday, 3 June)
- Re: Representing NULL in RDF (Monday, 3 June)
Dawson, Laura
DCMI Announce
Dominic Oldman
- Re: Rendering RDF in interactive html forms (Wednesday, 26 June)
- Rendering RDF in interactive html forms (Wednesday, 26 June)
- Re: The Great Public Linked Data Use Case Register for Non-Technical End User Applications (Wednesday, 26 June)
- Re: Big data applications for general users based on RDF - where are they? (Tuesday, 25 June)
- Re: List membership - more women (Tuesday, 25 June)
- Re: List membership - more women (Monday, 24 June)
- List membership - more women (Monday, 24 June)
- Re: The Great Public Linked Data Use Case Register for Non-Technical End User Applications (Monday, 24 June)
- Re: The Great Public Linked Data Use Case Register for Non-Technical End User Applications (Sunday, 23 June)
- Re: The Great Public Linked Data Use Case Register for Non-Technical End User Applications (Sunday, 23 June)
- The Great Public Linked Data Use Case Register for Non-Technical End User Applications (Sunday, 23 June)
- Re: Big data applications for general users based on RDF - where are they? (Sunday, 23 June)
- Re: Big data applications for general users based on RDF - where are they? (Sunday, 23 June)
- Re: Big data applications for general users based on RDF - where are they? (Saturday, 22 June)
- Re: Big data applications for general users based on RDF - where are they? (Saturday, 22 June)
- Re: RE: Big data applications for general users based on RDF - where are they? (Saturday, 22 June)
- Big data applications for general users based on RDF - where are they? (Saturday, 22 June)
- Re: linking data using a different conceptual framework Was does linked data need RDF? (Friday, 21 June)
- Re: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF (Wednesday, 19 June)
- Re: RDF and CIDOC CRM (Friday, 14 June)
- RDF and CIDOC - why the approach is important generally (Friday, 14 June)
- RDF and CIDOC CRM (Wednesday, 12 June)
Elena Simperl
Eric Prud'hommeaux
Erp, M.G.J. van
Frans Knibbe | Geodan
Gannon Dick
George Fazekas
Ghislain Atemezing
Giovanni Tummarello
glenn mcdonald
Gong Cheng
Gregg Reynolds
Harald Sack
HR
Hugh Glaser
- Re: Poll: What Are RDF's Unique Characteristics? (Monday, 24 June)
- Re: Poll: What Are RDF's Unique Characteristics? (Monday, 24 June)
- Re: The Great Public Linked Data Use Case Register for Non-Technical End User Applications (Monday, 24 June)
- Re: Big data applications for general users based on RDF - where are they? (Saturday, 22 June)
- Re: Big data applications for general users based on RDF - where are they? (Saturday, 22 June)
- Re: Big data applications for general users based on RDF - where are they? (Saturday, 22 June)
- Re: Big data applications for general users based on RDF - where are they? (Saturday, 22 June)
- Re: Linked Data discussions require better communication (Friday, 21 June)
- Re: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF (Wednesday, 19 June)
- Re: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF (Wednesday, 19 June)
- Re: Linked Stuff [was Re: RDF's challenge] (Tuesday, 11 June)
- Re: RDF's challenge (Tuesday, 11 June)
- Re: Business Models, Profitability, and Linked Data (Tuesday, 11 June)
- Re: Business Models, Profitability, and Linked Data (Tuesday, 11 June)
- Re: Representing NULL in RDF (Friday, 7 June)
- Re: There's No Money in Linked Data (Friday, 7 June)
- Re: Representing NULL in RDF (Tuesday, 4 June)
- Re: Representing NULL in RDF (Tuesday, 4 June)
- Re: Representing NULL in RDF (Tuesday, 4 June)
Irene Celino
Isabelle Augenstein
Isabelle L Augenstein
Jan Michelfeit
Jeff Mixter
Jerven Bolleman
John Domingue
John Erickson
John Goodwin
john.nj.davies@bt.com
José Luis
Juan Sequeda
Jörg Waitelonis [HPI]
Jürgen Jakobitsch SWC
KANZAKI Masahide
Karl Dubost
Kate Byrne
Kerstin Forsberg
Kingsley Idehen
- Re: Modeling the author's position from research papers into RDF graph (Sunday, 30 June)
- Re: Civic apps and Linked Data (Wednesday, 26 June)
- Re: Civic apps and Linked Data (Wednesday, 26 June)
- Re: Civic apps and Linked Data (Wednesday, 26 June)
- Re: Triad Logic (Tuesday, 25 June)
- Re: The Great Public Linked Data Use Case Register for Non-Technical End User Applications (Tuesday, 25 June)
- Re: What Does Point Number 3 of TimBL's Linked Data Mean? (Tuesday, 25 June)
- Re: What Does Point Number 3 of TimBL's Linked Data Mean? (Tuesday, 25 June)
- Re: The Great Public Linked Data Use Case Register for Non-Technical End User Applications (Tuesday, 25 June)
- Re: Poll: What Are RDF's Unique Characteristics? (Tuesday, 25 June)
- Contd: Poll: What Are RDF's Unique Characteristics? (Monday, 24 June)
- Re: Poll: What Are RDF's Unique Characteristics? (Monday, 24 June)
- Re: Poll: What Are RDF's Unique Characteristics? (Monday, 24 June)
- Re: Linked Data and the Original Web Proposal (Monday, 24 June)
- Poll: What Are RDF's Unique Characteristics? (Monday, 24 June)
- Re: Linked Data and the Original Web Proposal (Monday, 24 June)
- Re: RDF Investigations (Monday, 24 June)
- Linked Data and the Original Web Proposal (Monday, 24 June)
- Re: RDF Investigations (Monday, 24 June)
- Re: The Great Public Linked Data Use Case Register for Non-Technical End User Applications (Monday, 24 June)
- New DBpedia Overview Article Available (Monday, 24 June)
- Re: The Great Public Linked Data Use Case Register for Non-Technical End User Applications (Monday, 24 June)
- Re: The Great Public Linked Data Use Case Register for Non-Technical End User Applications (Monday, 24 June)
- Re: The Great Public Linked Data Use Case Register for Non-Technical End User Applications (Monday, 24 June)
- Re: The Great Public Linked Data Use Case Register for Non-Technical End User Applications (Monday, 24 June)
- Re: The Great Public Linked Data Use Case Register for Non-Technical End User Applications (Monday, 24 June)
- Re: The Great Public Linked Data Use Case Register for Non-Technical End User Applications (Monday, 24 June)
- Re: The Great Public Linked Data Use Case Register for Non-Technical End User Applications (Sunday, 23 June)
- Re: The Great Public Linked Data Use Case Register for Non-Technical End User Applications (Sunday, 23 June)
- Re: The Great Public Linked Data Use Case Register for Non-Technical End User Applications (Sunday, 23 June)
- Re: What Does Point Number 3 of TimBL's Linked Data Mean? (Saturday, 22 June)
- Re: What Does Point Number 3 of TimBL's Linked Data Mean? (Saturday, 22 June)
- Re: What Does Point Number 3 of TimBL's Linked Data Mean? (Saturday, 22 June)
- Re: To RDF or not to RDF (Saturday, 22 June)
- Re: What Does Point Number 3 of TimBL's Linked Data Mean? (Saturday, 22 June)
- Re: Linked Data discussions require better communication (Saturday, 22 June)
- Re: Linked Data discussions require better communication (Saturday, 22 June)
- Re: What Does Point Number 3 of TimBL's Linked Data Mean? (Saturday, 22 June)
- Re: What Does Point Number 3 of TimBL's Linked Data Mean? (Friday, 21 June)
- Re: What Does Point Number 3 of TimBL's Linked Data Mean? (Friday, 21 June)
- Re: Linked Data discussions require better communication (Friday, 21 June)
- What Does Point Number 3 of TimBL's Linked Data Mean? (Friday, 21 June)
- Re: Fwd: Linked Data discussions require better communication (Friday, 21 June)
- Re: Linked Data discussions require better communication (Friday, 21 June)
- Re: Linked Data discussions require better communication (Friday, 21 June)
- Re: Linked Data discussions require better communication (Thursday, 20 June)
- Re: Linked Data discussions require better communication (Thursday, 20 June)
- Re: Linked Data discussions require better communication (Thursday, 20 June)
- Re: Linked Data discussions require better communication (Thursday, 20 June)
- Re: Linked Data discussions require better communication (Thursday, 20 June)
- Re: Linked Data discussions require better communication (Thursday, 20 June)
- Re: Linked Data discussions require better communication (Thursday, 20 June)
- Re: Linked Data discussions require better communication (Thursday, 20 June)
- Re: Linked Data discussions require better communication (Thursday, 20 June)
- Re: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF (Thursday, 20 June)
- Re: 返: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF (Thursday, 20 June)
- Re: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF (Thursday, 20 June)
- Re: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF (Wednesday, 19 June)
- Re: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF (Wednesday, 19 June)
- Re: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF (Wednesday, 19 June)
- Re: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF (Wednesday, 19 June)
- Re: List etiquette [was Re: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF] (Wednesday, 19 June)
- Re: RDF, Linked Data etc : please ping me when it's over ... (Wednesday, 19 June)
- Re: RDF, Linked Data etc : please ping me when it's over ... (Wednesday, 19 June)
- Re: 返: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF (Wednesday, 19 June)
- Re: 返: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF (Wednesday, 19 June)
- Re: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF (Wednesday, 19 June)
- Re: 返: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF (Wednesday, 19 June)
- Re: 返: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF (Wednesday, 19 June)
- Re: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF (Wednesday, 19 June)
- Re: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF (Wednesday, 19 June)
- Illustrating how Linked Data and RDF are related (Tuesday, 18 June)
- Re: Fwd: The need for RDF in Linked Data (Tuesday, 18 June)
- Re: Fwd: The need for RDF in Linked Data (Tuesday, 18 June)
- Re: [ontolog-forum] How de facto standards are created (Tuesday, 18 June)
- Re: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF (Tuesday, 18 June)
- Re: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF (Tuesday, 18 June)
- Re: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF (Tuesday, 18 June)
- Re: 返: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF (Tuesday, 18 June)
- Re: 返: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF (Tuesday, 18 June)
- Re: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF (Tuesday, 18 June)
- Re: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF (Tuesday, 18 June)
- Re: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF (Tuesday, 18 June)
- Re: The need for RDF in Linked Data (Monday, 17 June)
- Re: The need for RDF in Linked Data (Monday, 17 June)
- Re: The need for RDF in Linked Data (Monday, 17 June)
- CLOSURE: Re-definition of Linked Data (Monday, 17 June)
- Re: The need for RDF in Linked Data (Monday, 17 June)
- Re: The need for RDF in Linked Data (Monday, 17 June)
- Re: The need for RDF in Linked Data (Monday, 17 June)
- Re: The need for RDF in Linked Data (Monday, 17 June)
- Re: [ontolog-forum] How de facto standards are created (Monday, 17 June)
- Re: The need for RDF in Linked Data (Monday, 17 June)
- Re: Linked Data in my Head (Monday, 17 June)
- Re: The need for RDF in Linked Data (Monday, 17 June)
- Re: The need for RDF in Linked Data (Monday, 17 June)
- Re: The need for RDF in Linked Data (Monday, 17 June)
- Re: Fwd: The need for RDF in Linked Data (Monday, 17 June)
- Re: The need for RDF in Linked Data (Monday, 17 June)
- Re: Explain Linked Data to me like I'm 5 (Friday, 14 June)
- Explain Linked Data to me like I'm 5 (Friday, 14 June)
- Re: Ending the Linked Data debate -- PLEASE VOTE *NOW*! (Friday, 14 June)
- Re: Ending the Linked Data debate -- PLEASE VOTE *NOW*! (Friday, 14 June)
- Re: JSON-LD/RDF feedback (Linked Data & RDF Conflation Deconstructed) (Friday, 14 June)
- Timeline of Systematic Data and Computable Knowledge (Thursday, 13 June)
- Re: Ending the Linked Data debate -- PLEASE VOTE *NOW*! (Thursday, 13 June)
- Re: Ending the Linked Data debate -- PLEASE VOTE *NOW*! (Thursday, 13 June)
- Re: Ending the Linked Data debate -- PLEASE VOTE *NOW*! (Thursday, 13 June)
- Linked Data and RDF, some perspective (Thursday, 13 June)
- Re: Ending the Linked Data debate -- PLEASE VOTE *NOW*! (Thursday, 13 June)
- OpenLink Shared Ontologies (Wednesday, 12 June)
- Re: RDF and CIDOC CRM (Wednesday, 12 June)
- Re: RDF and CIDOC CRM (Wednesday, 12 June)
- Re: Linked Stuff [was Re: RDF's challenge] (Wednesday, 12 June)
- Re: Linked Stuff [was Re: RDF's challenge] (Wednesday, 12 June)
- Re: Linked Stuff [was Re: RDF's challenge] (Wednesday, 12 June)
- Re: Linked Stuff [was Re: RDF's challenge] (Wednesday, 12 June)
- Re: Linked Stuff [was Re: RDF's challenge] (Tuesday, 11 June)
- Re: Linked Stuff [was Re: RDF's challenge] (Tuesday, 11 June)
- Re: Linked Stuff [was Re: RDF's challenge] (Tuesday, 11 June)
- Re: Linked Stuff [was Re: RDF's challenge] (Tuesday, 11 June)
- Re: Linked Stuff [was Re: RDF's challenge] (Tuesday, 11 June)
- Re: RDF's challenge (Tuesday, 11 June)
- Re: Linked Stuff [was Re: RDF's challenge] (Tuesday, 11 June)
- Re: Linked Stuff [was Re: RDF's challenge] (Tuesday, 11 June)
- Re: Linked Data Visualization: HTML5 based PivotViewer (Tuesday, 11 June)
- Re: Linked Stuff [was Re: RDF's challenge] (Tuesday, 11 June)
- Re: RDF's challenge (Tuesday, 11 June)
- Re: Linked Stuff [was Re: RDF's challenge] (Tuesday, 11 June)
- Re: Linked Stuff [was Re: RDF's challenge] (Tuesday, 11 June)
- Re: RDF's challenge (Tuesday, 11 June)
- Re: RDF's challenge (Tuesday, 11 June)
- Linked Data Visualization: HTML5 based PivotViewer (Tuesday, 11 June)
- Re: RDF's challenge (Tuesday, 11 June)
- Re: RDF's challenge (Tuesday, 11 June)
- Re: RDF's challenge (Tuesday, 11 June)
- Re: Business Models, Profitability, and Linked Data (Tuesday, 11 June)
- RDF's challenge (Tuesday, 11 June)
- Re: Business Models, Profitability, and Linked Data (Tuesday, 11 June)
- Re: Business Models, Profitability, and Linked Data (Monday, 10 June)
- Re: Business Models, Profitability, and Linked Data (Monday, 10 June)
- Re: Business Models, Profitability, and Linked Data (Monday, 10 June)
- Re: Business Models, Profitability, and Linked Data (Monday, 10 June)
- Re: Business Models, Profitability, and Linked Data (Saturday, 8 June)
- Re: Business Models, Profitability, and Linked Data (Friday, 7 June)
- Business Models, Profitability, and Linked Data (Friday, 7 June)
- Re: There's No Money in Linked Data (Friday, 7 June)
- Re: There's No Money in Linked Data (Friday, 7 June)
Kirrane, Sabrina
Leigh Dodds
Livia Predoiu
Luca Matteis
- Re: Linked Data and the Original Web Proposal (Monday, 24 June)
- Re: Linked Data and the Original Web Proposal (Monday, 24 June)
- Re: List membership - more women (Monday, 24 June)
- Re: Linked Data discussions require better communication (Thursday, 20 June)
- Re: Linked Data discussions require better communication (Thursday, 20 June)
- Re: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF (Wednesday, 19 June)
- Re: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF (Wednesday, 19 June)
- Re: 返: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF (Wednesday, 19 June)
- Re: 返: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF (Wednesday, 19 June)
- Re: Fwd: The need for RDF in Linked Data (Tuesday, 18 June)
- Re: 返: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF (Tuesday, 18 June)
- Re: 返: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF (Tuesday, 18 June)
- Re: 返: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF (Tuesday, 18 June)
- Re: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF (Tuesday, 18 June)
- Re: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF (was: Re: The need for RDF in Linked Data) (Tuesday, 18 June)
- Re: The need for RDF in Linked Data (Monday, 17 June)
- Re: The need for RDF in Linked Data (Monday, 17 June)
- Re: The need for RDF in Linked Data (Monday, 17 June)
- Re: The need for RDF in Linked Data (Monday, 17 June)
- Re: The need for RDF in Linked Data (Monday, 17 June)
- Re: The need for RDF in Linked Data (Monday, 17 June)
- Re: Linked Data in my Head (Monday, 17 June)
- Re: The need for RDF in Linked Data (Monday, 17 June)
- Re: The need for RDF in Linked Data (Monday, 17 June)
- Re: The need for RDF in Linked Data (Monday, 17 June)
- Re: The need for RDF in Linked Data (Monday, 17 June)
- Re: The need for RDF in Linked Data (Monday, 17 June)
- Re: The need for RDF in Linked Data (Monday, 17 June)
- Re: Explain Linked Data to me like I'm 5 (Friday, 14 June)
- Re: JSON-LD/RDF feedback (Linked Data & RDF Conflation Deconstructed) (Friday, 14 June)
- Re: Ending the Linked Data debate -- PLEASE VOTE *NOW*! (Thursday, 13 June)
- Re: Ending the Linked Data debate -- PLEASE VOTE *NOW*! (Thursday, 13 June)
- Re: Linked Stuff [was Re: RDF's challenge] (Wednesday, 12 June)
- Re: Linked Stuff [was Re: RDF's challenge] (Tuesday, 11 June)
- Re: Linked Stuff [was Re: RDF's challenge] (Tuesday, 11 June)
- Re: Linked Stuff [was Re: RDF's challenge] (Tuesday, 11 June)
- Re: Linked Stuff [was Re: RDF's challenge] (Tuesday, 11 June)
Magnus Knuth
Manu Sporny
Marco Neumann
Margaret Warren
Marieke Guy
martin
Martynas Jusevičius
Mateusz Radzimski
Mathieu d'Aquin
Matteo Casu
Melvin Carvalho
- Re: Linked Data Glossary is published! (Thursday, 27 June)
- Re: Big data applications for general users based on RDF - where are they? (Tuesday, 25 June)
- Re: What Does Point Number 3 of TimBL's Linked Data Mean? (Tuesday, 25 June)
- Re: The Great Public Linked Data Use Case Register for Non-Technical End User Applications (Monday, 24 June)
- Re: List membership - more women (Monday, 24 June)
- Re: Linked Data and the Original Web Proposal (Monday, 24 June)
- Re: The Test of Independent Invention (was: What Does Point Number 3 of TimBL's Linked Data Mean?) (Monday, 24 June)
- Re: The Great Public Linked Data Use Case Register for Non-Technical End User Applications (Monday, 24 June)
- Re: The Great Public Linked Data Use Case Register for Non-Technical End User Applications (Monday, 24 June)
- Re: Big data applications for general users based on RDF - where are they? (Sunday, 23 June)
- Re: Big data applications for general users based on RDF - where are they? (Sunday, 23 June)
- Re: RE: Big data applications for general users based on RDF - where are they? (Saturday, 22 June)
- The Test of Independent Invention (was: What Does Point Number 3 of TimBL's Linked Data Mean?) (Saturday, 22 June)
- Re: To RDF or not to RDF (Saturday, 22 June)
- Re: What Does Point Number 3 of TimBL's Linked Data Mean? (Saturday, 22 June)
- Re: Linked Data discussions require better communication (Friday, 21 June)
- Re: Linked Data discussions require better communication (Thursday, 20 June)
- Re: Linked Data discussions require better communication (Thursday, 20 June)
- Re: RDF, Linked Data etc : please ping me when it's over ... (Wednesday, 19 June)
- Re: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF (Wednesday, 19 June)
- Re: 返: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF (Tuesday, 18 June)
- Re: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF (Tuesday, 18 June)
- Re: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF (Tuesday, 18 June)
- Re: The need for RDF in Linked Data (Monday, 17 June)
- Re: The need for RDF in Linked Data (Monday, 17 June)
- Re: Linked Data in my Head (Monday, 17 June)
- Re: The need for RDF in Linked Data (Monday, 17 June)
- Re: The need for RDF in Linked Data (Monday, 17 June)
- Re: The need for RDF in Linked Data (Monday, 17 June)
- Re: The need for RDF in Linked Data (Monday, 17 June)
- Re: Ending the Linked Data debate -- PLEASE VOTE *NOW*! (Thursday, 13 June)
- Re: Ending the Linked Data debate -- PLEASE VOTE *NOW*! (Thursday, 13 June)
- Re: Ending the Linked Data debate -- PLEASE VOTE *NOW*! (Thursday, 13 June)
- Re: Ending the Linked Data debate -- PLEASE VOTE *NOW*! (Thursday, 13 June)
- Re: RDF's challenge (Tuesday, 11 June)
- Re: Linked Stuff [was Re: RDF's challenge] (Tuesday, 11 June)
- Re: RDF's challenge (Tuesday, 11 June)
- Re: Linked Stuff [was Re: RDF's challenge] (Tuesday, 11 June)
- Re: Business Models, Profitability, and Linked Data (Friday, 7 June)
- Re: There's No Money in Linked Data (Friday, 7 June)
Michael Brunnbauer
- Re: Modeling the author's position from research papers into RDF graph (Sunday, 30 June)
- Re: Modeling the author's position from research papers into RDF graph (Sunday, 30 June)
- Re: Modeling the author's position from research papers into RDF graph (Friday, 28 June)
- Re: Modeling the author's position from research papers into RDF graph (Thursday, 27 June)
- Re: Modeling the author's position from research papers into RDF graph (Thursday, 27 June)
- Re: Big data applications for general users based on RDF - where are they? (Wednesday, 26 June)
- Re: The Great Public Linked Data Use Case Register for Non-Technical End User Applications (Monday, 24 June)
- Re: The Great Public Linked Data Use Case Register for Non-Technical End User Applications (Monday, 24 June)
- Re: The Great Public Linked Data Use Case Register for Non-Technical End User Applications (Monday, 24 June)
- Re: RDF Investigations (Sunday, 23 June)
- Re: Big data applications for general users based on RDF - where are they? (Sunday, 23 June)
- Re: Big data applications for general users based on RDF - where are they? (Sunday, 23 June)
- Re: Big data applications for general users based on RDF - where are they? (Saturday, 22 June)
- Re: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF (Tuesday, 18 June)
- Re: Linked Data in my Head (Monday, 17 June)
Michelle Brook
Mike Bergman
Muriel Foulonneau
Nandana Mihindukulasooriya
Nathan
Nathan Rixham
Nickles, Matthias
Norman Gray
Obrst, Leo J.
Olaf Hartig
Ora.Lassila@nokia.com
Oscar Corcho
Panzer,Michael
Pascal Hitzler
Pat Hayes
- Re: RDF Investigations (Tuesday, 25 June)
- Re: RDF Investigations (Tuesday, 25 June)
- Re: RDF Investigations (Monday, 24 June)
- Re: Linked Data discussions require better communication (Thursday, 20 June)
- Re: Linked Data discussions require better communication (Thursday, 20 June)
- Re: Representing NULL in RDF (Friday, 14 June)
- Re: Representing NULL in RDF (Tuesday, 11 June)
- Re: RDF's challenge (Tuesday, 11 June)
- Re: Representing NULL in RDF (Sunday, 9 June)
- Re: Representing NULL in RDF (Wednesday, 5 June)
- Re: Representing NULL in RDF (Monday, 3 June)
Paul Groth
Paul Tyson
paul.worrall@interition.net
Peter DeVries
Peter Mika
Phil Archer
Phillip Lord
Pieter Colpaert
Prateek
ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program
- Re: Civic apps and Linked Data (Thursday, 27 June)
- Re: Civic apps and Linked Data (Wednesday, 26 June)
- The Great LD 2013 Debate: is Linked Data defined by the WWW? (Wednesday, 26 June)
- Literature on semantic web and similar models (Monday, 24 June)
- Re: The Test of Independent Invention (was: What Does Point Number 3 of TimBL's Linked Data Mean?) (Monday, 24 June)
- Re: Big data applications for general users based on RDF - where are they? (Sunday, 23 June)
- Re: To RDF or not to RDF (Saturday, 22 June)
- linking data using a different conceptual framework Was does linked data need RDF? (Friday, 21 June)
- Re: Illustrating how Linked Data and RDF are related (Wednesday, 19 June)
- Re: RDF, Linked Data etc : please ping me when it's over ... (Wednesday, 19 June)
- Re: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF (was: Re: The need for RDF in Linked Data) (Tuesday, 18 June)
- Re: Business Models, Profitability, and Linked Data (Saturday, 8 June)
Richard Light
richard@light.demon.co.uk
Rob Warren
Robert Sanderson
Sands Alden Fish
Sarven Capadisli
Sergio Fernández
Silvio Peroni
Stephane Fellah
- Re: Linked Data Glossary is published! (Thursday, 27 June)
- Re: Linked Data Glossary is published! (Thursday, 27 June)
- Re: RDF Investigations (Monday, 24 June)
- Re: What Does Point Number 3 of TimBL's Linked Data Mean? (Friday, 21 June)
- Re: What Does Point Number 3 of TimBL's Linked Data Mean? (Friday, 21 June)
- Re: Linked Data discussions require better communication (Friday, 21 June)
- Re: Linked Data discussions require better communication (Friday, 21 June)
- Fwd: Linked Data discussions require better communication (Friday, 21 June)
- Re: Linked Data discussions require better communication (Thursday, 20 June)
- Re: Linked Data discussions require better communication (Thursday, 20 June)
Steve Harris
Stéphane Corlosquet
Sven R. Kunze
Sven R.Kunze
Svensson, Lars
Sören Auer
Ted Thibodeau Jr
Thomas Thurner
Tim Berners-Lee
Todd DeLuca
Tommaso Di Noia
Tudor Groza
Vanessa Lopez
Víctor Rodríguez Doncel
William Waites
Ying Ding
Young,Jeff (OR)
- Re: Big data applications for general users based on RDF - where are they? (Sunday, 23 June)
- Re: Big data applications for general users based on RDF - where are they? (Saturday, 22 June)
- RE: Big data applications for general users based on RDF - where are they? (Saturday, 22 June)
- RE: RE: Big data applications for general users based on RDF - where are they? (Saturday, 22 June)
- RE: Big data applications for general users based on RDF - where are they? (Saturday, 22 June)
- RE: What Does Point Number 3 of TimBL's Linked Data Mean? (Saturday, 22 June)
- RE: Linked Data discussions require better communication (Saturday, 22 June)
- RE: Linked Data discussions require better communication (Friday, 21 June)
- RE: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF (Thursday, 20 June)
- RE: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF (Thursday, 20 June)
Yury Katkov
Yves Raimond
☮ elf Pavlik ☮
エリクソン トーレ
Last message date: Sunday, 30 June 2013 20:54:46 UTC