- From: Gregg Reynolds <dev@mobileink.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 13:36:27 -0500
- To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Cc: public-lod@w3.org
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 11:02 PM, Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us> wrote: > ...snip > > Well, its a formal, artificial, language, and it comes with a semantics as part of its definition. Just like many other logics in many logic textbooks, many programming languages, etc.. So yes, I guess it does "privilege" that semantics, since that semantics is part of it (by definition). > Hi Pat, Out of mercy for the other folks on the list, I think the thing to do is address the points you've raise one way or another in blog posts. I somehow doubt there's very much interest in watching the two of us go back and forth about the meaning of "abstract". Once I get some text up with sufficient detail, if it seems appropriate I'll post a note and you can have another go at me then. Thanks, Gregg
Received on Tuesday, 25 June 2013 18:36:55 UTC