- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2013 15:41:25 +0200
- To: Hugh Glaser <hg@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Cc: "<doint@oldman.me.uk>" <doint@oldman.me.uk>, "jyoung@oclc.org" <jyoung@oclc.org>, "public-lod@w3 org" <public-lod@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKaEYh+00brBRErwfCrgvcuokukknoXUYF=Q3omOz-mm-YN9Zw@mail.gmail.com>
On 23 June 2013 15:39, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On 22 June 2013 20:01, Hugh Glaser <hg@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote: > >> Hi Melvin, >> I wouldn't really say that Tabulator was suitable for "general non >> technical users". >> > > Fair, comment, but that's something we'd like to change soon! > > >> I just clicked on the link, and apart from getting endless windows with >> "Couldn't set callback for redirects: TypeError: 'undefined' is not an >> object (evaluating 'xhr.channel')" >> it is pretty opaque as to what to do next. >> Even trying to read the help. >> That's not to say it isn't useful - it I just wouldn't even expect my >> technical non-SemWeb colleagues to feel the SemWeb was for them by being >> told that was an application for non-technical people. >> > > Thanks for giving it a try, sorry about that demo, it's *really* old, we > have much better working versions now. > > I'll try and update the documentation in the next week or so. > > The easily way to give tabulator a try right now is to check out the > firefox extension have play around: > > git clone --recursive > https://github.com/linkeddata/tabulator-firefox.git > cd tabulator-firfox > make > > Then add it to your firefox profile(s) -- something like: > > for i in /home/melvin/.mozilla/firefox/*/extensions/ ; do echo $PWD > > tabulator@csail.mit.edu ; done > *typo -- should read* for i in ~/.mozilla/firefox/*/extensions/ ; do echo $PWD > $i/tabulator@csail.mit.edu <tabulator@csail.mit.edu> ; done > > Then restart firefox and give it a try. You should have a full read / > write linked data browser experience which you can tailor to your need. > > A simple test to see if it's installed could be say: > http://www.w3.org/ns/auth/acl > > Thanks for the feedback, I agree that apps like this need to be user > friendly and well documented. To an extent we rely on volunteer > contributions, so any feedback or help is appreciated! :) > > >> Best >> Hugh >> >> On 22 Jun 2013, at 18:08, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > >> > >> > >> > On 22 June 2013 18:56, Dominic Oldman <doint@oldman.me.uk> wrote: >> > So publishing linked data is easy but creating applications that make >> use of it is a completely different kettle of fish and very difficult, >> particularly in the way I described. >> > >> > My assumption is that the linked data community is keen to create these >> user applications and not consign linked data to isolated back end >> processing jobs and a tool for computer scientists. How do we as a >> community solve the semantic interoperability issue? >> > >> > >> > People have different focuses. I would guess that most are interested >> in back ends and creating (mainly read only) data sets. >> > >> > However there are a few people working on applications, to my >> knowledge. If you look at Tim's linked data note, he references the >> tabulator project: >> > >> > http://tabulator.org/ >> > >> > Which is an open source project he and his team at MIT have been >> developing over the last 10 years or so. There's about 20 or so linked >> data applications from calendars to miroblogs. The source can be found at: >> > >> > https://github.com/linkeddata >> > >> > This is my favourite project to hack on in my spare time. If there's >> anybody out there interested in helping to create useful linked data apps, >> would love to hear from you! :) >> > >> > Dominic >> > >> > Sent from Yahoo! Mail on Android >> > >> > Sent from Yahoo! Mail on Android >> > >> > >> > From: Dominic Oldman <do_home@btopenworld.com>; >> > To: jyoung@oclc.org <jyoung@oclc.org>; >> > Subject: Re: RE: Big data applications for general users based on RDF - >> where are they? >> > Sent: Sat, Jun 22, 2013 4:41:03 PM >> > >> > So publishing linked data is easy but creating applications that make >> use of it is a completely different kettle of fish and very difficult, >> particularly in the way I described. >> > >> > My assumption is that the linked data community is keen to create these >> user applications and not consign linked data to isolated back end >> processing jobs and a tool for computer scientists. How do we as a >> community solve the semantic interoperability issue? >> > >> > Dominic >> > >> > Sent from Yahoo! Mail on Android >> > >> > >> > From: Young,Jeff (OR) <jyoung@oclc.org>; >> > To: doint@oldman.me.uk <doint@oldman.me.uk>; public-lod@w3 org < >> public-lod@w3.org>; >> > Subject: RE: Big data applications for general users based on RDF - >> where are they? >> > Sent: Sat, Jun 22, 2013 4:27:31 PM >> > >> > It’s pretty easy to write an XSL stylesheet to convert “records” into >> RDF/XML, and then write a little M/R job to run the XSL against a big bulk >> of records to boil it down. >> > >> > >> > The intellectual challenge is the semantic mapping of idiomatic data >> into RDF vocabulary terms. >> > >> > >> > Jeff >> > >> > >> > From: Dominic Oldman [mailto:doint@oldman.me.uk] >> > Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2013 12:16 PM >> > To: public-lod@w3 org >> > Subject: Big data applications for general users based on RDF - where >> are they? >> > >> > >> > >> > Why are there so few useful linked data applications for general non >> technical users that provide functions that people need to support and >> enhance their work and which operate over large amounts of data owned by >> different organisations with a high degree of semantic interoperability and >> robustness? >> > >> > Dominic >> > >> > Sent from Yahoo! Mail on Android >> > >> > >> > >> >> >
Received on Sunday, 23 June 2013 13:41:54 UTC