- From: Gregg Reynolds <dev@mobileink.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 14:52:12 -0500
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Cc: public-lod@w3.org
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote: > On 6/24/13 10:32 AM, Pat Hayes wrote: >> >> If you can give up on all this, what do you take yourself to be referring >> to when you say "RDF" ? You have just dismissed virtually every defining >> characteristic of RDF as either wrong or inessential. So what is left? >> >> Pat > > I am going to create a poll aimed as getting a feel for what folks perceive > as the defining characteristics of RDF. In recent times, I've come to > believe those characteristics aren't so clear anymore. Kingsley, Kingsley, Kingsley, you old thread hijacker you. ;) Best of luck, but for the record, I don't have a dog in that fight. As far as I'm concerned people can use RDF to mean whatever they want it to mean, as long as the software works. -Gregg
Received on Monday, 24 June 2013 19:52:39 UTC