- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 12:37:55 -0400
- To: public-lod@w3.org
- Message-ID: <51C875E3.9090905@openlinksw.com>
On 6/24/13 10:32 AM, Pat Hayes wrote: > If you can give up on all this, what do you take yourself to be referring to when you say "RDF" ? You have just dismissed virtually every defining characteristic of RDF as either wrong or inessential. So what is left? > > Pat I am going to create a poll aimed as getting a feel for what folks perceive as the defining characteristics of RDF. In recent times, I've come to believe those characteristics aren't so clear anymore. Here's a draft of the questions for the poll: 1. Don't know 2. Don't care 3. Linked Data Creation 4. Interpretable Linked Data Creation 5. W3C standard. To you and anyone else that might be interested, are there any other questions I should add to the list above? -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Monday, 24 June 2013 16:38:19 UTC