Re: RDF, Linked Data etc : please ping me when it's over ...

On 19 June 2013 14:44, Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com> wrote:

> I guess I'm not the only one : I'm about to put a filter rule on my inbox
>
> "from public-lod" AND (contains "RDF" and "Linked Data") => trash
>
> No one having a decent full-time job and normal life can have the
> bandwidth (not even speaking of the will or interest) to follow those
> threads. It's too bad because there is certainly a lot of amazing stuff I
> miss.
>
> So please ping me when it's over, and if someone can write a summary and
> possibly draw useful conclusions, please do so and post it on a stable URI
> where everything could be parsed in a single piece of document.
>
> Note : anyone willing to do that is both a saint and a fool :)
>

*Summary

*
*Fact Finding*
*
*
1. Person A and Person B had a disagreement on the definition of linked
data.

2. Person A asked the group if Linked Data implies RDF

3. Group said Yes

*Interpretation*

4. Person A interpreted this as Linked Data REQUIRES RDF

5. Several Objections to this interpretation were voiced.  And Sustained.

*Conclusion*

6. Some observers wished to continue arguing about it

7. Several observers said it really doesnt matter, let's get on and work

8. Person A and Person B sorted out their differences

Ping: it's over



>
> Have fun
>
> Bernard
>
>
> *Bernard Vatant
> *
> Vocabularies & Data Engineering
> Tel :  + 33 (0)9 71 48 84 59
> Skype : bernard.vatant
> Blog : the wheel and the hub <http://bvatant.blogspot.com>
> Linked Open Vocabularies : lov.okfn.org
> --------------------------------------------------------
> *Mondeca**          **                   *
> 3 cité Nollez 75018 Paris, France
> www.mondeca.com
> Follow us on Twitter : @mondecanews <http://twitter.com/#%21/mondecanews>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Meet us during the European Open Data Week <http://opendataweek.org> in
> Marseille (June 25-28)
>
>
>