- From: Barry Norton <barry.norton@ontotext.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 14:12:19 +0100
- To: "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>
Now that we've established, whatever TimBL's Note says, that Linked Data doesn't require SPARQL, RDF or HTTP it's time we talked about the elephant in the room: URIs. A thought experiment (literally): in my brain is a lot of knowledge - 'metadata' if you will - connected up in a graph. I can't read someone else's thoughts, in the form of a writing - whether it's a book with an ISBN (and hence a URI), or a crudely drawn message on a bathroom wall - and integrate that into the graph. Sure, I don't produce RDF, or speak HTTP, very easily, and my thoughts don't have global identifiers, but the whole beauty of Linked Data is that it is loosely coupled to computers anyway. What conclusion do I draw? I've seen it. It's people. Linked Data is made out of people. LINKED DATA IS PEOPLE. WE'VE GOT TO STOP THEM... SOMEHOW! Barry (you can't throw me to the lions - I'm Charlton Heston)
Received on Monday, 17 June 2013 13:12:49 UTC