- From: Barry Norton <barry.norton@ontotext.com>
- Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2013 22:16:29 +0100
- To: public-lod@w3.org
On 03/06/13 15:31, Robert Sanderson wrote: > > Our solution was to use rdf:nil, but we would be happy to change that > if there is a more appropriate approach. > That was my suggested solution last time this came up on list. It does make rdf:nil a member of the property's range though, which is... odd. Barry
Received on Monday, 3 June 2013 21:16:54 UTC