Re: Representing NULL in RDF

On 03/06/13 15:31, Robert Sanderson wrote:
> Our solution was to use rdf:nil, but we would be happy to change that 
> if there is a more appropriate approach.

That was my suggested solution last time this came up on list. It does 
make rdf:nil a member of the property's range though, which is... odd.


Received on Monday, 3 June 2013 21:16:54 UTC