- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 08:11:05 -0400
- To: public-lod@w3.org
- Message-ID: <51C04E59.6000207@openlinksw.com>
On 6/18/13 1:42 AM, エリクソン トーレ wrote: > One could argue that these examples, while not being RDF, still > adhere to the RDF abstract syntax (triples describing typed directed > relationships between resource). In the real-world (outside the W3C): RDF didn't invent the triple or 3-tuple approach to entity relationship representation. It didn't invent identifiers either (and that includes IRIs, URIs, or URLs). Structured data representation isn't a concept that came to light on the back of RDF. As is always the case, RDF is small innovation within a vast continuum. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Tuesday, 18 June 2013 12:11:30 UTC