- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 08:15:05 -0400
- To: public-lod@w3.org
- Message-ID: <51C04F49.3060200@openlinksw.com>
On 6/18/13 2:03 AM, David Booth wrote: > On 06/18/2013 01:42 AM, エリクソン トーレ wrote: >> One could argue that these examples, while not being RDF, still >> adhere to the RDF abstract syntax (triples describing typed directed >> relationships between resource). > > But that's what RDF *is* -- the abstract syntax. RDF is syntax > independent. Not only is it syntax independent, it's devoid of genealogy too :-) You are turning RDF's meaning away from "Resource Description Framework" to "Reality Distortion Field". Luckily, I believe only a minority of folks hold the distorted views you continue to espouse in this debate. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Tuesday, 18 June 2013 12:15:29 UTC