- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 09:20:12 -0400
- To: public-lod@w3.org
- Message-ID: <51C5A48C.5000704@openlinksw.com>
On 6/21/13 9:41 PM, Ora.Lassila@nokia.com wrote: > existing thread, and also for probably saying things other folks have > already brought up] > > I have worked on RDF and systems using RDF for over 15 years now (and on > RDF's "non-Web" predecessors before that). The most important thing I have > learned is that while it is possible to do Linked Data and Semantic Web > stuff *without* RDF, whatever alternative technology you choose, you soon > feel compelled to add features that make it look like RDF. I particularly > see this whenever someone comes to me advocating the use of JSON. RDF is > what it is for a reason, *not* because we arbitrarily threw something > together. > > So it is not that RDF "looks bad" or whatever people might be saying. It > is that other technologies and approaches "fall short" of what Linked Data > and Semantic Web really need. Let's not please reinvent things or shove a > round peg in a square hole just because someone prefers curly braces over > angle brackets. Issues like that are not interesting (at all), and we have > more important things to do. > > Regards, > > - Ora > Ora, I am sure you know I am not advocating reinvention of anything. I am advocating the principle of "independent invention" [1] whereby the concepts denoted by "Linked Data" , "Semantic Web", and "RDF" are the focal point rather than their many labels. As you know personally, I am all about telling the same story in different ways, subject to my target audience. As you also know, at this point in time, there are more folks familiar with the entity relationship model and EAV/CR than there are RDF and its specific contributions to this innovation continuum. Our collective goal is to get everyone to embrace the fundamental concept. That can happen without being distracted by its many labels. We want to free data from the tyranny of applications. Data and applications should be loosely coupled, just as concepts and labels should be loosely coupled :-) Links: 1. http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Principles.html -- Axioms of Web Architecture . -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Saturday, 22 June 2013 13:20:38 UTC