- From: Frans Knibbe | Geodan <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 22:37:51 +0200
- To: public-lod@w3.org
- Message-ID: <51C8AE1F.3070406@geodan.nl>
Hello Dave, Thank you! I think the QUDT definition was just what I was looking for. I was aware of the QUDT vocabulary but I guess I did not expect to find percentage defined there because I did not consider it a unit. I am using multi-measure observations, but I think I can manage with not attaching the unit to the observations but to the general description of the measure property (qb:MeasureProperty), as suggested in paragraph 6.5.1 of the Data Cube vocabulary: http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-data-cube/#dsd-mm-obs Greetings, Frans On 24-6-2013 19:32, Dave Reynolds wrote: > Hi Frans, > > On 24/06/13 17:37, Frans Knibbe | Geodan wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I would like to publish some statistical data. A few of these numbers >> are percentages. What is the best way to make it clear to data consumers >> that the numbers are to be treated as percentages? As far as I can tell, >> the XSD data types do not suffice. > > QUDT does include percent as a unit: http://qudt.org/vocab/unit#Percent > > Assuming you are using the RDF Data Cube then you can use this as the > value of unit of measure attribute (sdmx-attribute:unitMeasure). > > If you are dealing with single measures or measure-dimension cubes > that should be fine. > > You are using multi-measure observations then life gets harder. In > that case you might consider encoding your values as e.g. > qudt:QuantityValues and attaching the unit of measure that way. > > Dave > > > -- -------------------------------------- *Geodan* President Kennedylaan 1 1079 MB Amsterdam (NL) T +31 (0)20 - 5711 347 E frans.knibbe@geodan.nl www.geodan.nl <http://www.geodan.nl> | disclaimer <http://www.geodan.nl/disclaimer> --------------------------------------
Received on Monday, 24 June 2013 20:38:25 UTC