- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 20:31:56 +0200
- To: Bernadette Hyland <bhyland@3roundstones.com>
- Cc: Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>, egov-ig mailing list <public-egov-ig@w3.org>, HCLS <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKaEYhKyOVopQcFKBY0GthKJYTZ7m6pv=b+kecWfrjfAZXXU0w@mail.gmail.com>
On 27 June 2013 17:08, Bernadette Hyland <bhyland@3roundstones.com> wrote: > Hi, > On behalf of the editors, I'm pleased to announce the publication of the > peer-reviewed *Linked Data Glossary* published as a W3C Working Group > Note effective 27-June-2013.[1] > > We hope this document serves as a useful glossary containing terms defined > and used to describe Linked Data, and its associated vocabularies and best > practices for publishing structured data on the Web. > > The LD Glossary is intended to help foster constructive discussions > between the Web 2.0 and 3.0 developer communities, encouraging all of us > appreciate the application of different technologies for different use > cases. We hope the glossary serves as a useful starting point in your > discussions about data sharing on the Web. > > Finally, the editors are grateful to David Wood for contributing the > initial glossary terms from Linking Government Data<http://www.springer.com/computer/database+management+%26+information+retrieval/book/978-1-4614-1766-8>, > (Springer 2011). The editors wish to also thank members of the Government > Linked Data Working Group <http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/> with special > thanks to the reviewers and contributors: Thomas Baker, Hadley Beeman, > Richard Cyganiak, Michael Hausenblas, Sandro Hawke, Benedikt Kaempgen, > James McKinney, Marios Meimaris, Jindrich Mynarz and Dave Reynolds who > diligently iterated the W3C Linked Data Glossary in order to create a > foundation of terms upon which to discuss and better describe the Web of > Data. If there is anyone that the editors inadvertently overlooked in this > list, please accept our apologies. > Looks awesome, well done! I was actually asked for something like this already this month. Would there be any possibility to add two more, which come up a bit: FP -- Functional Property IFP -- Inverse Functional Property > > Thank you one & all! > > Sincerely, > Bernadette Hyland<http://3roundstones.com/about-us/leadership-team/bernadette-hyland/>, > 3 Round Stones <http://3roundstones.com/> Ghislain Atemezing<http://www.eurecom.fr/%7Eatemezin>, > EURECOM <http://www.eurecom.fr> Michael Pendleton, US Environmental > Protection Agency <http://www.epa.gov> Biplav Srivastava, IBM<http://www.ibm.com/in/research/> > > W3C Government Linked Data Working Group > Charter: http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/ > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/ld-glossary/ >
Received on Thursday, 27 June 2013 18:32:29 UTC