返: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF

> 差出人: Kingsley Idehen [mailto:kidehen@openlinksw.com]
> 送信日時: 2013年6月20日 6:37
> On 6/19/13 3:41 PM, David Booth wrote:
>> On 06/19/2013 02:29 AM, エリクソン　トーレ wrote:
>>> My point was that even if the data producer doesn't know anything about
>>> RDF, when applying the meme he will produce something that follows
>>> the RDF abstract syntax. That is the strength of RDF and why I think
>>> it is an intrinsic part of Linked Data.

> My simple point (which I will defend vigorously) is this:
> 
> You don't need to know anything about RDF to create and publish Linked
> Data in line with TimBL's original Linked Data meme.

I agree on this point. That was a prerequisite of my statement above.
You don't have to know English grammar to produce sentences in English.
However, knowing the grammar will let you produce better, more understandable
sentences. RDF is the grammar of linked data.

Tore

* Please no comments pointing out errors in my English...

Received on Thursday, 20 June 2013 01:29:36 UTC