- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 01:00:42 +0200
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Cc: public-lod@w3.org
On 24 June 2013 14:31, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote: > On 6/24/13 2:14 AM, Michael Brunnbauer wrote: >> >> Hello Kingsley Idehen, >> >> On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 05:32:00PM -0400, Kingsley Idehen wrote: >>> >>> We don't need a central repository of anything. Linked Data is supposed >>> to be about enhancing serendipitous discovery of relevant things. You appear to be arguing against the simple useful practice of communally collecting information. Just because we can scatter information around the Web and subsequently aggregate it, doesn't mean that such fragmentation is always productive. I don't see anyone arguing that the only option is to monolithically centralise everything forever; just that a communal effort on cataloguing things might be worth the time. > Google already demonstrates some of this, in the most obvious sense via its > search engine, and no so obvious via its crawling of Linked Data which then > makes its way Google Knowledge Graph and G+ etc.. -> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citation_needed You've sometimes said that all Web pages are already "Linked Data" with boring link-types. Are you talking about something more RDFish in this case? Dan
Received on Monday, 24 June 2013 23:01:24 UTC