Re: 返: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF

On 18 June 2013 15:24, David Booth <david@dbooth.org> wrote:

> On 06/18/2013 08:29 AM, Luca Matteis wrote:
>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com
>> <mailto:kidehen@openlinksw.com**>> wrote:
>>
>>     Luckily, I believe only a minority of folks hold the distorted views
>>     you continue to espouse in this debate.
>>
>> I actually believe the opposite. That's why I wish emails had +1 in them.
>>
>
> Indeed, the results of this poll on the meaning of the term Linked Data
> are pretty clear, though I'm sure an extremely vocal minority will swear up
> and down that they are meaningless:
> http://goo.gl/GMeom
>

-1


>
> The original poll was posted here:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/**Public/public-lod/2013Jun/**0163.html<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2013Jun/0163.html>
>
> David
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 18 June 2013 13:37:21 UTC