- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 06:51:33 -0400
- To: public-lod@w3.org
- Message-ID: <51C03BB5.7090507@openlinksw.com>
On 6/18/13 12:05 AM, ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program wrote: > . > > If we want to avoid many flavors of linked data clouding the Internet > scape (sorry for the pun) we need to come up with a more acceptable > definition of how we interpret linked data in terms of semantic linkage. > > We generally equate linked data with RDF and related tools and > technologies but the rest of the netizens may beg to differ. It's quite simple, and it's called RDF based Linked Data. What does that give you? The web-like structure of Linked Data combined with the *explicit* (rather than implicit) machine- and human-comprehensible entity relationship semantics of RDF. As already stated in an earlier post, I don't understand why "inference" and "reasoning" are words that are no longer associated (instinctively) with RDF as unique selling points. Being able to make increasingly precise sense of data (based on its entity relationship based structure) is a major virtue! -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Tuesday, 18 June 2013 10:51:56 UTC