Re: 返: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF

On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Barry Norton <barry.norton@ontotext.com>wrote:

> I'm all for an architectural/philosophical consideration of what Linked
> Data is, but I don't think we're being sensitive to what the 1000+
> subscribers of this list are mainly looking for, which is best practice and
> working technology in my opinion.


+1

Received on Wednesday, 19 June 2013 12:20:23 UTC