Friday, 30 November 2012
- Re: Linking Across Provenance Bundles - comments
- Re: to note editors
- Re: to note editors
- Addressing the key issues of PROV-DC for FPWD
- Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace
- Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace
- Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace
- Re: prov-overview for review for fpwd (ISSUE-605)
- to note editors
- prov-wg Telcon Minutes Nov. 29, 2012
Thursday, 29 November 2012
- Re: PROV-AQ: How to indicate SPARQL endpoint for provenance (ISSUE 609)
- Re: PROV-AQ: How to indicate SPARQL endpoint for provenance (ISSUE 609)
- Re: PROV-AQ: How to indicate SPARQL endpoint for provenance (ISSUE 609)
- PROV-ISSUE-609 (sparql-endpoint-uri): Specify how to locate a SPARQL endpoint for querying provenance [Accessing and Querying Provenance]
- Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace
- Linking Across Provenance Bundles - comments
- Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace
- Re: prov-overview for review for fpwd (ISSUE-605)
- PROV-ISSUE-608: How do we accomodate extensions from other notes into PROV-XML schema [XML Serialization]
- Re: prov-wg Telcon Agenda Nov. 29, 2012
- Re: prov-overview for review for fpwd (ISSUE-605)
- Re: PROV-AQ: How to indicate SPARQL endpoint for provenance
- PROV-AQ: How to indicate SPARQL endpoint for provenance
- Re: mentionOf in XML schema
- mentionOf in XML schema
Wednesday, 28 November 2012
- PROV-ISSUE-607 (dc-smiles-review): Review of the Dublin Core mapping document [Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core]
- RE: Request review of prov-dc
- Re: prov-wg Telcon Agenda Nov. 29, 2012
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-605 (fpwd-prov-overview): reviews of prov-overview for fpwd [PROV-OVERVIEW]
- prov-wg Telcon Agenda Nov. 29, 2012
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-605 (fpwd-prov-overview): reviews of prov-overview for fpwd [PROV-OVERVIEW]
Tuesday, 27 November 2012
- PROV-ISSUE-606:
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-605 (fpwd-prov-overview): reviews of prov-overview for fpwd [PROV-OVERVIEW]
- prov-overview for review for fpwd (ISSUE-605)
- PROV-ISSUE-605 (fpwd-prov-overview): reviews of prov-overview for fpwd [PROV-OVERVIEW]
- problems with mercurial
- Re: prov-links review
- Re: prov-links review
- prov-links review for FPWD (ISSUE-604/ACTION-135)
- PROV-ISSUE-604:
- Fwd: Transition Request: PROV to Candidate Recommendation
- Re: prov-links review
- prov-links review
Monday, 26 November 2012
- Re: prov-dm, prov-n, prov-constraints preliminary staging
- Re: prov-dm, prov-n, prov-constraints preliminary staging
- Re: CR docs linking to implementation report?
- Re: mini-review of PROV-OVERVIEW
- mini-review of PROV-OVERVIEW
- PROV-AQ, ISSUE 601 and general status update
- PROV-AQ: ISSUE-425: format of service description
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-600 (prov-pingback): Add simple provenance pingback header spec to PROV-AQ [Accessing and Querying Provenance]
- Issue 596: PROV-AQ and Bundles
- Re: Provenance service discovery in PROV-AQ
- Re: Request review of prov-dc
- deadline extension: BigPROV @EDBT 2013 and ProvBench: Managing and Querying Provenance Data at Scale
Sunday, 25 November 2012
- Re: prov-dm, prov-n, prov-constraints preliminary staging
- RE: prov-dm, prov-n, prov-constraints preliminary staging
- Re: Draft comments for the Organization Ontology LC (Deadline Midnight GMT November 24)
- Re: Draft comments for the Organization Ontology LC (Deadline Midnight GMT November 24)
- Feedback to the LC of the Organization Ontology from the Prov WG
- Re: Provenance Working Group Teleconference:Minutes of 22 November 2012
- Re: Provenance Working Group Teleconference:Minutes of 22 November 2012
Saturday, 24 November 2012
Friday, 23 November 2012
- Re: prov-dm, prov-n, prov-constraints preliminary staging
- Provenance Working Group Teleconference:Minutes of 22 November 2012
- Re: prov-dm, prov-n, prov-constraints preliminary staging
- Fwd: XML schema for provenance
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-600 (prov-pingback): Add simple provenance pingback header spec to PROV-AQ [Accessing and Querying Provenance]
- Re: review of prov-dc
- Re: review of prov-dc
- Re: Draft comments for the Organization Ontology LC (Deadline Midnight GMT November 24)
- RE: prov-dm, prov-n, prov-constraints preliminary staging
- Re: Request review of prov-dc
- PROV-ISSUE-603 (Craig's FB DC Note): Craig's M Feedback on the DC- Note [Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core]
- Re: review of prov-dc
- PROV-ISSUE-602 (Luc's FB DC Note): Luc's Feedback on the DC-Note [Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core]
- review of prov-dc
- Draft comments for the Organization Ontology LC (Deadline Midnight GMT November 24)
Thursday, 22 November 2012
- Re: CR docs linking to implementation report?
- Re: prov-dm, prov-n, prov-constraints preliminary staging
- Re: prov-dm, prov-n, prov-constraints preliminary staging
- Re: prov-dm, prov-n, prov-constraints preliminary staging
- Re: prov-dm, prov-n, prov-constraints preliminary staging
- Re: prov-dm, prov-n, prov-constraints preliminary staging
- Re: prov-dm, prov-n, prov-constraints preliminary staging
- Re: prov-dm, prov-n, prov-constraints preliminary staging
- Re: prov-dm, prov-n, prov-constraints preliminary staging
- RE: prov-dm, prov-n, prov-constraints preliminary staging
- note to all editors
- Re: Request review of prov-dc
- Re: F2F4 minutes
- Re: F2F4 minutes
- Re: F2F4 minutes
- Re: ISSUE-595: Prov-xml subtyping needs to be marked in the document
Wednesday, 21 November 2012
- Re: Request review of prov-dc
- Request review of prov-dc
- Re: prov-dm, prov-n, prov-constraints preliminary staging
- RE: alternate example in primer
- Re: ACTION-152: Trim to write a paragraph mot ivating needs for provenance (Provenance Working Group)
- my review of http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-org/
- blog post on F2F4
- Re: Provenance service discovery in PROV-AQ
- prov-dm, prov-n, prov-constraints preliminary staging
- search engine optimization for PROV
- Re: ACTION-152: Trim to write a paragraph mot ivating needs for provenance (Provenance Working Group)
- Re: Provenance service discovery in PROV-AQ
- Re: ROV-WG Telecon Agenda 22 November 2012
- Re: ACTION-152: Trim to write a paragraph mot ivating needs for provenance (Provenance Working Group)
- Re: F2F4 minutes
Tuesday, 20 November 2012
- Re: PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 22 November 2012
- ACTION-136 and ISSUE-475: mentionOf
- Re: F2F4 minutes
- Re: CR docs linking to implementation report?
- Re: F2F4 minutes
- Re: CR docs linking to implementation report?
- Re: F2F4 minutes
- Re: ISSUE-595: Prov-xml subtyping needs to be marked in the document
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-553: QNames are too restrictive as identifiers [XML Serialization]
- Re: future-proofing prov-o.owl (and "namespace concatenation")
- Re: CR docs linking to implementation report?
- Re: Provenance service discovery in PROV-AQ
- Re: F2F4 minutes
- Re: ISSUE-595: Prov-xml subtyping needs to be marked in the document
- Re: future-proofing prov-o.owl (and "namespace concatenation")
- Re: future-proofing prov-o.owl (and "namespace concatenation")
- Re: future-proofing prov-o.owl (and "namespace concatenation")
- Re: future-proofing prov-o.owl (and "namespace concatenation")
- Re: ROV-WG Telecon Agenda 22 November 2012
- Re: ROV-WG Telecon Agenda 22 November 2012
- F2F4 minutes
- ROV-WG Telecon Agenda 22 November 2012
- CR docs linking to implementation report?
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-600 (prov-pingback): Add simple provenance pingback header spec to PROV-AQ [Accessing and Querying Provenance]
- Re: current version of prov-dc mapping?
- Re: current version of prov-dc mapping?
- Re: future-proofing prov-o.owl (and "namespace concatenation")
- Re: ACTION-152: Trim to write a paragraph mot ivating needs for provenance (Provenance Working Group)
- Re: current version of prov-dc mapping?
- Re: future-proofing prov-o.owl (and "namespace concatenation")
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-600 (prov-pingback): Add simple provenance pingback header spec to PROV-AQ [Accessing and Querying Provenance]
- Re: ACTION-152: Trim to write a paragraph mot ivating needs for provenance (Provenance Working Group)
- Re: ISSUE-595: Prov-xml subtyping needs to be marked in the document
- future-proofing prov-o.owl (and "namespace concatenation")
- current version of prov-dc mapping?
- Provenance service discovery in PROV-AQ
- Bundles and PROV-AQ (Issue 596)
- PROV-ISSUE-601 (provenance-information): Rename provenance information to provenance description? [Accessing and Querying Provenance]
- PROV-AQ - format of returned provenance information
- PROV-ISSUE-600 (prov-pingback): Add simple provenance pingback header spec to PROV-AQ [Accessing and Querying Provenance]
- Format for service descriptions
- PROV document bibliographies
- PROV-ISSUE-599 (provenance-description): Should "provenance description" be formally defined? [prov-dm]
- Re: ISSUE-595: Prov-xml subtyping needs to be marked in the document
- Re: ISSUE-595: Prov-xml subtyping needs to be marked in the document
- Re: ISSUE-595: Prov-xml subtyping needs to be marked in the document
- Re: ISSUE-595: Prov-xml subtyping needs to be marked in the document
- Re: ISSUE-595: Prov-xml subtyping needs to be marked in the document
- Re: ISSUE-595: Prov-xml subtyping needs to be marked in the document
Monday, 19 November 2012
- Re: prov bibliography
- Re: prov bibliography
- CR publication timetable
- Re: staged prov-n
- Re: To what page do we point potential implementers?
- RE: To what page do we point potential implementers?
- prov-dm staged for CR
- staged prov-n
- prov bibliography
- Re: alternate example in primer
- RE: alternate example in primer
Sunday, 18 November 2012
Friday, 16 November 2012
- To what page do we point potential implementers?
- Re: Please approve this draft PROV-O response by Tuesday 5pm GMT
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-566 (fix-images): HTML images still have references to the bundles as named greaphs [PROV-O HTML]
Thursday, 15 November 2012
- Re: PROV in the Semantic Web Layer Cake?
- Re: diagram conventions for PROV
- Re: diagram conventions for PROV
- Re: diagram conventions for PROV
- Re: PROV in the Semantic Web Layer Cake?
- Re: PROV in the Semantic Web Layer Cake?
- Re: PROV in the Semantic Web Layer Cake?
- Re: alternate example in primer
- PROV in the Semantic Web Layer Cake?
- Re: alternate example in primer
Wednesday, 14 November 2012
- PROV-ISSUE-598 (remove-query-section-query): Should we remove the best practice section in PROV-AQ and handle in FAQ? [Accessing and Querying Provenance]
- Re: alternate example in primer
- Re: alternate example in primer
- Re: alternate example in primer
- Re: alternate example in primer
Tuesday, 13 November 2012
- Re: alternate example in primer
- Re: alternate example in primer
- Re: alternate example in primer
- RE: alternate example in primer
- diagram conventions for PROV
- Re: alternate example in primer
- alternate example in primer
Monday, 12 November 2012
Sunday, 11 November 2012
Saturday, 10 November 2012
- Re: Proposed response to public comments on primer [Deadline: Thursday]
- RE: Proposed response to public comments on primer [Deadline: Thursday]
- Announcement of the FP7 Project: Linked Data Benchmark Council (LDBC)
- Re: PROV-AQ security (privacy) considerations
- PROV-ISSUE-597 (prov-aq-owl-terms): Review prov-aq.owl and update PROV-AQ term descriptions as appropriate [Accessing and Querying Provenance]
Friday, 9 November 2012
- PROV-ISSUE-596 (Bundle-access): Should PROV-AQ discuss mechanisms for accessing bundles?
- ISSUE-595: Prov-xml subtyping needs to be marked in the document
- Fwd: Comments on Prov-O
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-594: Error in wasInformedBy property chain [Ontology]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-491: [external] feedback on prov:agent explanation. [PROV-O HTML]
- Re: FYI prov in openannotation
- Re: FYI prov in openannotation
- Re: prov: namespace terms for PROV-AQ
Thursday, 8 November 2012
Friday, 9 November 2012
- Re: FYI prov in openannotation
- FYI prov in openannotation
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-594: Error in wasInformedBy property chain [Ontology]
- Re: prov-xml review for release as a FPWD
Thursday, 8 November 2012
- Re: prov-xml review for release as a FPWD
- Re: prov-xml review for release as a FPWD
- Re: prov-xml review for release as a FPWD
- Re: Remotely calling into F2F4
- Re: Remotely calling into F2F4
- Re: PROV-AQ security (privacy) considerations
- Re: Citiing PROV-XML
- Remotely calling into F2F4
- Re: PROV-AQ security (privacy) considerations
- RE: PROV-ISSUE-591: delegation PROV-O example missing activity reference [Primer]
- RE: Proposed response to public comments on primer
- Citiing PROV-XML
- PROV-ISSUE-594: Error in wasInformedBy property chain [Ontology]
Wednesday, 7 November 2012
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-479: cite TriG for examples [Ontology]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-479: cite TriG for examples [Ontology]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-479: cite TriG for examples [Ontology]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-591: delegation PROV-O example missing activity reference [Primer]
- PROV-ISSUE-593: [editorial] hadActivity in Delegation example [PROV-O HTML]
- RE: PROV-XML in Primer
- RE: PROV-ISSUE-591: delegation PROV-O example missing activity reference [Primer]
- RE: Potentially improving outreach?
- Re: PROV-AQ security (privacy) considerations
Tuesday, 6 November 2012
- Re: PROV-AQ security (privacy) considerations
- Re: PROV-AQ security (privacy) considerations
- Re: Comment on http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/tip/ontology/ProvenanceOntology.owl
- Re: Please approve this draft PROV-O response by Tuesday 5pm GMT
- Re: Please approve this draft PROV-O response by Tuesday 5pm GMT
- Re: Please approve this draft PROV-O response by Tuesday 5pm GMT
- Re: PROV-AQ Issue 565 - URIs for link relations (HTTP Link headers, etc.)
- PROV-AQ Issue 565 - URIs for link relations (HTTP Link headers, etc.)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-591: delegation PROV-O example missing activity reference [Primer]
- Re: PROV-AQ security (privacy) considerations
- Re: prov: namespace terms for PROV-AQ
- PROV-AQ security (privacy) considerations
- prov: namespace terms for PROV-AQ
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-589: scope of prefixes in prov-n documents [prov-n]
- Re: prov-wg: Vote on Exit Criteria
- Re: prov-xml review for release as a FPWD
- Re: prov-xml review for release as a FPWD
- Re: prov-xml review for release as a FPWD
Monday, 5 November 2012
- Re: HTTP 500 error when pulling from hg repository
- Re: PROV-XML in Primer
- HTTP 500 error when pulling from hg repository
- Re: PROV-XML in Primer
- Re: Please approve this draft PROV-O response by Tuesday 5pm GMT
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-479: cite TriG for examples [Ontology]
- RE: Please approve this draft PROV-O response by Tuesday 5pm GMT
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-491: [external] feedback on prov:agent explanation. [PROV-O HTML]
- Re: Please approve this draft PROV-O response by Tuesday 5pm GMT
- Re: Please approve this draft PROV-O response by Tuesday 5pm GMT
- Please approve this draft PROV-O response by Tuesday 5pm GMT
- RE: PROV-ISSUE-455 (Dong): Type mismatch between PROV-O and PROV-DM [Ontology]
- Re: proposed response to public comment (deadline Tuesday noon GMT)
Sunday, 4 November 2012
Saturday, 3 November 2012
- Re: Proposed response to public comments on primer
- Proposed response to public comments on primer
- RE: PROV-XML in Primer
Friday, 2 November 2012
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-589: scope of prefixes in prov-n documents [prov-n]
- Re: prov-xml review for release as a FPWD
- Re: prov-xml review for release as a FPWD
- RE: proposed response to public comment (deadline Tuesday noon GMT)
Thursday, 1 November 2012
- Re: PROV-WG telcon minutes 2012-11-01
- PROV-WG telcon minutes 2012-11-01
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-591: delegation PROV-O example missing activity reference [Primer]
- RE: PROV-ISSUE-591: delegation PROV-O example missing activity reference [Primer]
- PROV-ISSUE-591: delegation PROV-O example missing activity reference [Primer]
- Re: Closing ISSUE-568
- PROV-ISSUE-590: wasInfluencedBy should not be used directly [PROV-O HTML]
- Re: pairs of implementations?
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-566 (fix-images): HTML images still have references to the bundles as named greaphs [PROV-O HTML]
- Closing ISSUE-568
- Re: pairs of implementations?
- Re: prov-o ISSUE-349
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-589: scope of prefixes in prov-n documents [prov-n]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-575: identifier field [prov-dm-constraints]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-575: identifier field [prov-dm-constraints]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-455 (Dong): Type mismatch between PROV-O and PROV-DM [Ontology]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-573 (mime-type): mime type registration feedback [prov-n]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-496: ivan's feedback on prov-n LC [prov-n]
- Re: Provenance Working Group resolution ISSUE-447 and ISSUE-500 (subactivity)
- PROV-ISSUE-589: scope of prefixes in prov-n documents [prov-n]
- prov-xml review for release as a FPWD
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-574 (primer-figure): Update primer overview figure [Primer]
- proposed response to public comment (deadline Tuesday noon GMT)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-575: identifier field [prov-dm-constraints]
- RE: PROV-ISSUE-574 (primer-figure): Update primer overview figure [Primer]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-455 (Dong): Type mismatch between PROV-O and PROV-DM [Ontology]
- trying to resolve ISSUE-491
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-559: For delegation, two agents need to have some overlap in their lifetime. [prov-dm-constraints]
- Re: prov-wg draft agenda F2F4
- Re: pairs of implementations?
- Re: about the implementation questionnaire
- Re: prov-wg: Vote on Exit Criteria
- about the implementation questionnaire
- hi, a scribe is needed for today, thanks
- RE: PROV-ISSUE-410 (prov-primer-review): Feedback on Primer document [Primer]
- Re: progress on prov-o actions/issues
- Re: Reminder: Review of responses to PROV-CONSTRAINTS public comments
- Re: prov-wg: Vote on Exit Criteria
- Re: Reminder: Review of responses to PROV-CONSTRAINTS public comments
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-410 (prov-primer-review): Feedback on Primer document [Primer]
- Re: effect of ISSUE-477 on prov-constraints
- Potentially improving outreach?
- Re: Reminder: Review of responses to PROV-CONSTRAINTS public comments
- Re: Reminder: Review of responses to PROV-CONSTRAINTS public comments
- Re: effect of ISSUE-477 on prov-constraints
- Re: effect of ISSUE-477 on prov-constraints
- effect of ISSUE-477 on prov-constraints
- progress on prov-o actions/issues
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-552 (subclass-prov-o): Check subclass definitions in prov-o [Ontology]
- Re: Provenance Working Group resolution ISSUE-447 and ISSUE-500 (subactivity)
- Re: further responses and closed issues in prov-dm
- Re: additional PROV responses
- Re: PROV-N responses
- Re: prov-wg: Vote on Exit Criteria
- Re: PROV WG Telecon 2012.11.01
- Re: prov-wg: Vote on Exit Criteria
- Re: pairs of implementations?
- Re: Reminder: Review of responses to PROV-CONSTRAINTS public comments