- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 08:24:20 +0000
- To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- CC: W3C provenance WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>, Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
Tim, Thanks for your feedback. On 20/11/2012 18:38, Timothy Lebo wrote: > Graham, > > 1) > Your capitalization of VoID is incorrect. It's a quite "of" :-) Doh, I don't know how I missed that. Consistently. I'll fix it. > 2) > I am uncomfortable with the phrase "and by extension the resources it contains" in: > > "might indicate a provenance service providing information about that dataset, > and by extension the resources it contains:" > > since "void:Dataset 'containing' resources" is ill defined, and even if we > stated void:inDataset, the provenance of the dataset is not necessarily the > provenance of the resources that the dataset describes. Yes, it was probably an ill-chosen example, though it seemed like a good idea at the time to link to other metadata work. I'll see if I can think of something less controversial to use. #g -- > > On Nov 20, 2012, at 9:09 AM, Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org > <mailto:GK@ninebynine.org>> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I had an action (but no issue) to expand the discussion of provenance service >> discovery to take account of prov:hasProvenanceService. I've done this, and >> added an example related to a VOiD dataset description. Revised text is at: >> >> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/tip/paq/prov-aq.html#provenance-service-discovery >> >> Feedback welcome. >> >> #g >> -- >> >> >
Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2012 08:25:35 UTC