- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 16:41:12 +0000
- To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- CC: W3C provenance WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Tim, Thanks for clarifying. I'll take a look at prov-aq.ttl/.owl when I've got the prov-aq document in something approaching final form. (I assume one is generated from the other, so I can focus on either one? I choose prov-aq.ttl.) #g -- On 06/11/2012 14:48, Timothy Lebo wrote: > Graham, > > > On Nov 6, 2012, at 9:13 AM, Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'm not sure where we ended up with regard to defining PROV-AQ terms in the prov: namespace. > > > We agreed to remove the AQ terms from prov-o.owl, and make a separate prov-aq.owl to define the terms from AQ. > Then, all OWL files would be concatenated and made available at the PROV namespace (http://www.w3.org/ns/prov). > The provenance of the concatenation would also be included when requesting the namespace. > The mechanics have not been fully implemented, so this will take some collaboration to finish up. > > >> I see that there's a prov-aq.ttl (and .owl) file in the "paq" area of the provenance document repository (apparently created by Stephan), but it currently contains a lot of terms that are nothing to do with PROV-AQ (as well as a few that are). > > I dont' recall the details, but that might just be the last copy of PROV-O.owl before we took out the AQ terms. > So, feel free to remove anything in prov-aq.ttl that is not from the AQ note. > >> >> I also see that a number of PRPV-AQ properties are defined, along with annotations: >> >> :aq "http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/tip/paq/prov-aq.html#todo"^^xsd:anyURI ; >> :category "access-and-query" ; > > > If you don't need those, then clean them out. They were part of the PROV-O annotations that guide the HTML cross reference generation code. > >> >> Am I correct in surmising that this file is intended to provide the OWL descriptions of all terms introduced by PROV-AQ? > > Yes. > >> >> If so: >> >> How complete is this document believed to be? > > Not sure. Relatively complete? :-) > >> >> Can I assume that the ontology terms introduced here are final? > > No. > > >> >> Are there any further changes that require PROV-AQ editor input? > > > It requires PROV-AQ editor review and guidance. We can help discuss and implement things if needed. > > >> >> How should I cite the ontology document (currently PROV-AQ references the PROV-O spec, but with PROV-AQ terms not described there, that does not seem like a useful thing to do)? > > > > http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/ says: > > [[ > The namespace for all PROV-O terms is http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#. > The OWL encoding of the PROV Ontology is available here. > ]] > > Where "here" will become http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o.owl > > So, I suggest that AQ.html links to http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-aq.owl > > Ivan is the gatekeeper for getting documents into http://www.w3.org/ns (via CVS) > > It was decided that the OWL files NOT be in the /tr path because that would "freeze" them and it would be hard to update. > But we have "free reign" in /ns. > > Regards, > Tim >
Received on Friday, 9 November 2012 04:05:52 UTC