Love the conneg On Nov 20, 2012, at 19:20, Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu> wrote: >>>>>> I wonder whether we should not use extension-less URI-s everywhere, eg, http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o-20120724, and let conneg work to choose among RDF/XML or turtle versions. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> That is what I would prefer. But I think we're bending certain ways to help the bad tooling that is out there. >>>>> The tradeoff that is in place is to point to the extension less URIs using specializationOf. >>>> >>>> You mean that is what you will do (at the moment, all the URI-s have an extension) >>> >>> >>> >>> I meant that I would prefer to not use extension-less URI-s everywhere and let conneg work. >>> Are you saying to just do it that way? >> >> That would be my preference, unless we hit some practical issue. >> >> Ivan > > > Great. Then I'll press forward with that. > > prov-wg, speak now or forever hold your peace…. > > -Tim > >Received on Tuesday, 20 November 2012 20:11:45 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 20 November 2012 20:11:45 GMT