- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 09:54:59 -0500
- To: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- Cc: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <528B25EB-C228-4725-813F-DB5BDAE484E5@rpi.edu>
Stian, I adopted your redefinition and wrote up the response at: http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ResponsesToPublicComments#ISSUE-491_.28prov:agent.29 prov-wg, The following response will become the WG's response unless I hear objections before tomorrow (Tue) afternoon UK time. Regards, Tim ISSUE-491 (prov:agent) Original email: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-wg/2012Sep/0040.html Tracker: https://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/491 Group Response: The redundant and confusing rdfs:comments were removed from prov:{entity,activity,agent} Editor's definitions were added to prov:{entity,activity,agent} in place of reusing the definition from prov:{Agent,Entity,Activity}Influence, e.g.: The prov:agent property references an prov:Agent which influenced a resource. This property applies to an prov:AgentInfluence, which is given by a subproperty of prov:qualifiedInfluence from the influenced prov:Entity, prov:Activity or prov:Agent. References: Changes to the document: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/rev/b4f53beb7914 - PROV-O added editorsDefinition to prov:activity, prov:entity, prov:agent. http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/rev/8b1359797129 - PROV-O removed comments on subproperties of prov:influencer. Reflected in PROV-O HTML: http://aquarius.tw.rpi.edu/prov-wg/prov-o#agent http://aquarius.tw.rpi.edu/prov-wg/prov-o#entity http://aquarius.tw.rpi.edu/prov-wg/prov-o#activity On Sep 27, 2012, at 10:56 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk> wrote: > Suggested replacement definition: > >> The property prov:agent describes an prov:Agent which influenced a resource. This property applies to an prov:AgentInfluence, which is given by prov:qualifiedInfluence or its subproperties from the influenced prov:Entity, prov:Activity or prov:Agent. > > > Tim - if I add this as a <editorsDefinition> to #agent - should I > remove the <sharesDefinitionWith > rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#AgentInfluence"/> ? > > > If style is acceptable, I'll replicate it for prov:entity and > prov:activity, as I agree with Patrice that just copying the > *Influence definition makes it confusing. > > > On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker > <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: >> PROV-ISSUE-491: [external] feedback on prov:agent explanation. [PROV-O HTML] >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/491 >> >> Raised by: Timothy Lebo >> On product: PROV-O HTML >> >> I was looking over the PROV-O writeup, and I want to raise two points. >> Pleas forward appropriately, if you deem it appropriate. >> >> If you search for "Property: prov:agent op" at >> http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/ you find: >> >> "The property used by a prov:AgentInfluence to cite the Agent that >> influenced an Entity, Activity, or Agent." >> 1) A property is "used" by an agent influence to "cite"--is the agent >> influence writing a specification? >> >> Perhaps: "If x is in the prov:agent relationships with y, x is an >> instance of AgentInfluence and y is an instance of Agent that >> influenced an Entity, Activity, or Agent." >> >> OR (either way should be based on an established and clear convention >> for the document) >> >> "An agent influence is in the prov:agent relationship with an agent >> only if the agent influenced an Entity, Activity, or Agent." >> >> 2)For the first sentence the passage, that as the reader I assume is >> to begin defining the prov:activity property, does not mention >> prov:agent, it should. The passage that I mention in #1 is not in the >> first passage, and in fact is after the example that is given. This is >> confusing for the reader. If you are introducing and defining a >> property, then define the property first. I see the same thing for >> prov:activity. In searching for "Class: prov:AgentInfluence" I see >> that the initial passage for prov:AgentInfluence is the same initial >> passage for prov:agent and prov:activity. So perhaps this is part of >> some auto formatting/convention? >> >> Cheers, >> Patrice >> >> >> > > > > -- > Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team > School of Computer Science > The University of Manchester > >
Received on Monday, 5 November 2012 14:55:40 UTC