- From: Stephan Zednik <zednis@rpi.edu>
- Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 09:31:18 -0600
- To: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- Cc: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <D42F0020-A406-4F5A-B511-C0D1BAA83FE2@rpi.edu>
It looks like we can only have 5 options in the grid question, and each question can only have one answer. currently the options are 1) Consumes 2) Produces 3) Consumes and Produces 4) Does not Support I could add another option to this question above, rephrase the options from the question above, or add another question for this question. Option1: Add new option to the list above, "Consumes and Produces Externally Generated Provenance". Option 2: Add "Externally Generated Provenance" after "Consumes" in all options to the above question. Option 3: Create a new question "Known Support for Consumption of Externally Generated Provenance by Feature" with options "Known to Support | Not Known to Support" for each feature. This would be another grid question and would have just the two options. --Stephan On Oct 31, 2012, at 6:46 PM, Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl> wrote: > Hi Stephan, > > I wonder if it would be possible to put a check box or something by each feature so people can note where a particular feature was known to be used by another tool? > > Paul > > On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 3:59 AM, Stephan Zednik <zednis@rpi.edu> wrote: > Checking in to see if the current questionnaire paragraph text > > "Has this implementation been used to consume a prov serialization generated by another tool? If so, please identify the other tool and describe how it was used." > > is good enough for our purposes or if we should perhaps re-word the question or add some additional questions. > > --Stephan > > On Oct 22, 2012, at 2:41 AM, Stephan Zednik <zednis@rpi.edu> wrote: > >> >> On Oct 19, 2012, at 12:41 PM, Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl> wrote: >> >>> Could we ask that as well? >> >> We currently have a paragraph question on provenance exchange. >> >> Question title: Provenance Exchange >> >> Help Text: Has this implementation been used to consume a prov serialization generated by another tool? If so, please identify the other tool and describe how it was used. >> >> Perhaps with some tweaking to this question we will have what we need. >> >> As for updating the per-feature support question... >> >> Google Forms is pretty limited and right the question is structured as a Grid where the user can make one and only one selection for each feature (row in grid) from the following options (columns in the grid): Consumes, Produces, Produces and Consumes, Does not Support. >> >> I do not think we can change the question so the user can make multiple selections for any given feature or have any write-in options. If we add another column that explicitly asks about consumption of externally-produced provenance; the user will be unable to specify any further info such as what external tool produced said feature serialization or in what language (PROV-N, PROV-O, PROV-XML). >> >> Because of the limitations of the Grid question type I think we should use paragraph text questions to elicit feedback on our more complex questions such as proof of language-specific consumption of externally generated provenance features. >> >> --Stephan >> >> >>> >>> Also, I'm wondering for the constraints whether we need to ask on a per constraint basis given that we have this testing procedure approach. Maybe that section can be reduced... >>> >>> thanks >>> Paul >>> >>> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Stephan Zednik <zednis@rpi.edu> wrote: >>> we ask on a per-feature basis if it consumes, but we don't explicitly say 'from another implementation'. >>> >>> --Stephan >>> >>> On Oct 19, 2012, at 12:33 PM, Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl> wrote: >>> >>> > Hi Stephan, >>> > >>> > I was looking but couldn't seem to find it. Do we ask whether a particular implementation consumes provenance information from another implementation on a per feature basis? >>> > >>> > cheers >>> > Paul >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> -- >>> Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl) >>> http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/ >>> Assistant Professor >>> - Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group | >>> Artificial Intelligence Section | Department of Computer Science >>> - The Network Institute >>> VU University Amsterdam >> > > > > > -- > -- > Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl) > http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/ > Assistant Professor > - Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group | > Artificial Intelligence Section | Department of Computer Science > - The Network Institute > VU University Amsterdam
Received on Thursday, 1 November 2012 15:31:45 UTC