RE: PROV-ISSUE-455 (Dong): Type mismatch between PROV-O and PROV-DM [Ontology]

Thanks, Tim.
Luc, I'm happy with the change. I've closed the issue.

Dong.

From: Timothy Lebo [mailto:lebot@rpi.edu]
Sent: 01 November 2012 16:48
To: Luc Moreau
Cc: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: PROV-ISSUE-455 (Dong): Type mismatch between PROV-O and PROV-DM [Ontology]


On Nov 1, 2012, at 12:18 PM, Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk<mailto:l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>> wrote:


Hi Dong,

Could you please confirm the changes made to the document address your concern?

The latest draft is at http://aquarius.tw.rpi.edu/prov-wg/prov-o#PrimarySource

Regards,
Tim


Can we close this issue?

Thanks,
Luc

On 07/18/2012 01:50 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:

PROV-ISSUE-455 (Dong): Type mismatch between PROV-O and PROV-DM [Ontology]

http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/455

Raised by: Trung Dong Huynh
On product: Ontology

In PROV-DM and PROV-N, prov:PrimarySource is used as the type for the hadPrimarySource relation while PROV-O currently uses prov:Source (http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm.html#cross-references-to-prov-o-and-prov-n).
I think there should not be such a mismatch given that both the documents share the same namespace.



--
Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk<mailto:l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm

Received on Monday, 5 November 2012 10:52:55 UTC