- From: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 01:34:36 +0100
- To: James Cheney <jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Cc: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 1 November 2012 00:35:04 UTC
Hi James, I'm happy with all the responses. regards Paul On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 12:04 PM, James Cheney <jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk> wrote: > Hi, > > just a reminder that it would be helpful for any comments on the > responses to issues: > > *ISSUE-584, ISSUE-579, ISSUE-585, ISSUE-583* > > *ISSUE-576, ISSUE-580, ISSUE-577, ISSUE-578, ISSUE-581* > > *ISSUE-582, ISSUE-586, ISSUE-587, ISSUE-588* > > ISSUE-556 > > by today, so that any disagreement within the WG on how to respond can > be resolved by tomorrow. I would like to propose that we agree on these > responses and send to the commenters for acknowledgement at tomorrow's > meeting, so that we can hopefully close all issues by next week's > face-to-face meeting prior to a vote to progress all of the recommendation > track documents. > > The responses are collected at: > > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ResponsesToPublicComments#PROV-CONSTRAINTS.28Under_review.29 > > --James > -- -- Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl) http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/ Assistant Professor - Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group | Artificial Intelligence Section | Department of Computer Science - The Network Institute VU University Amsterdam
Received on Thursday, 1 November 2012 00:35:04 UTC