Re: CR docs linking to implementation report?

Yes we should.

Paul


On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu> wrote:

>  prov-wg,
>
>  The following two bullets appear in the pub rules checker [1].
> Should we coordinate on the text and links to cover these two requirements?
>
>  Thanks,
> Tim
>
>
>
>    1. It should include an estimated date by which time the Working Group
>    expects to have sufficient implementation experience.
>    Please verify manually; not tested.
>    2. It must include a link to a preliminary interoperability or
>    implementation report, or a statement that no such report exists.
>    Please verify. No candidate found (looking for links containing the
>    word 'implementation' or 'interoperability'. Is another term used? Is there
>    a link to a statement that no report is necessary?
>
>
>  [1]
> http://services.w3.org/xslt?xmlfile=http%3A%2F%2Fservices.w3.org%2Ftidy%2Ftidy%3FpassThroughXHTML%3D1%26docAddr%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fdvcs.w3.org%252Fhg%252Fprov%252Fraw-file%252Ftip%252Fontology%252FOverview.html&xslfile=http%3A%2F%2Fservices.w3.org%2Fxslt%3Fxmlfile%3Dhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2005%2F07%2Fpubrules%253Fuimode%253Dchecker_full%2526year%253D0001%2526docstatus%253Dcr-tr%2526rectrack%253Dyes%2526prevrec%253D%2526patpol%253Dw3c%2526normative%253Dyes%2526uri%253Dhttp%25253A%25252F%25252Fdvcs.w3.org%25252Fhg%25252Fprov%25252Fraw-file%25252Ftip%25252Fontology%25252FOverview.html%2526filterValues%253Dform%2526nscheckmanual%253D%2526display%253Dall%2526recursive%253Doff%2526recurse_auth%253Don%26xslfile%3Dhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2005%2F09%2Fchecker%2Fframe.xsl%26display%3Dall%26recurse_auth%3Don&uimode=checker_full&filterValues=form&year=0001&docstatus=cr-tr&rectrack=yes&prevrec=&patpol=w3c&normative=yes&doc_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fdvcs.w3.org%2Fhg%2Fprov%2Fraw-file%2Ftip%2Fontology%2FOverview.html&recursive=off&nscheckmanual=&display=all&recurse_auth=on<http://services.w3.org/xslt?xmlfile=http://services.w3.org/tidy/tidy?passThroughXHTML=1&docAddr=http%253A%252F%252Fdvcs.w3.org%252Fhg%252Fprov%252Fraw-file%252Ftip%252Fontology%252FOverview.html&xslfile=http://services.w3.org/xslt?xmlfile=http://www.w3.org/2005/07/pubrules%253Fuimode%253Dchecker_full%2526year%253D0001%2526docstatus%253Dcr-tr%2526rectrack%253Dyes%2526prevrec%253D%2526patpol%253Dw3c%2526normative%253Dyes%2526uri%253Dhttp%25253A%25252F%25252Fdvcs.w3.org%25252Fhg%25252Fprov%25252Fraw-file%25252Ftip%25252Fontology%25252FOverview.html%2526filterValues%253Dform%2526nscheckmanual%253D%2526display%253Dall%2526recursive%253Doff%2526recurse_auth%253Don&xslfile=http://www.w3.org/2005/09/checker/frame.xsl&display=all&recurse_auth=on&uimode=checker_full&filterValues=form&year=0001&docstatus=cr-tr&rectrack=yes&prevrec=&patpol=w3c&normative=yes&doc_uri=http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/tip/ontology/Overview.html&recursive=off&nscheckmanual=&display=all&recurse_auth=on>
>