W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > November 2012

Re: PROV-AQ Issue 565 - URIs for link relations (HTTP Link headers, etc.)

From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 12:14:33 -0500
Cc: W3C provenance WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <E0939622-E85E-4A23-84CF-4ECF32B20B47@rpi.edu>
To: Graham Klyne <graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk>

On Nov 6, 2012, at 11:51 AM, Graham Klyne <graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk> wrote:

> Re: https://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/565
> Reviewing this issue, and in particular around the message at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-wg/2012Oct/0039.html, I think this leads to an decision to use full URIs in the link relations.  This would eliminate section 6 (IANA considerations) from this document, and require examples to be updated throughout.
> I'd like to check that everyone who cares is OK with this fairly significant change.

I care, because I've tried to encode AQ in the PROV-O HTML document as RDFa and it didn't work.
This was a while ago (March?), and I didn't raise the discussion to the list, so I could be doing something wrong.
I used full URIs.

So, I'd like to discuss further.


> #g
Received on Tuesday, 6 November 2012 17:15:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 6 November 2012 17:15:01 GMT