- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 12:14:33 -0500
- To: Graham Klyne <graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
- Cc: W3C provenance WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Graham, On Nov 6, 2012, at 11:51 AM, Graham Klyne <graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk> wrote: > Re: https://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/565 > > Reviewing this issue, and in particular around the message at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-wg/2012Oct/0039.html, I think this leads to an decision to use full URIs in the link relations. This would eliminate section 6 (IANA considerations) from this document, and require examples to be updated throughout. > > I'd like to check that everyone who cares is OK with this fairly significant change. I care, because I've tried to encode AQ in the PROV-O HTML document as RDFa and it didn't work. This was a while ago (March?), and I didn't raise the discussion to the list, so I could be doing something wrong. I used full URIs. So, I'd like to discuss further. Regards, Tim > > #g > >
Received on Tuesday, 6 November 2012 17:15:01 UTC