- From: Tim Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 08:44:06 -0500
- To: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Cc: W3C provenance WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>, Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
Sent from my iPad On Nov 21, 2012, at 3:24, Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org> wrote: > >> 2) >> I am uncomfortable with the phrase "and by extension the resources it contains" in: >> >> "might indicate a provenance service providing information about that dataset, >> and by extension the resources it contains:" >> >> since "void:Dataset 'containing' resources" is ill defined, and even if we >> stated void:inDataset, the provenance of the dataset is not necessarily the >> provenance of the resources that the dataset describes. > > Yes, it was probably an ill-chosen example, though it seemed like a good idea at the time to link to other metadata work. I'll see if I can think of something less controversial to use. I think the void example is fine, I would suggest to just remove the phrase : >> and by extension the resources it contains Tim > > #g > -- > >> >> On Nov 20, 2012, at 9:09 AM, Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org >> <mailto:GK@ninebynine.org>> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I had an action (but no issue) to expand the discussion of provenance service >>> discovery to take account of prov:hasProvenanceService. I've done this, and >>> added an example related to a VOiD dataset description. Revised text is at: >>> >>> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/tip/paq/prov-aq.html#provenance-service-discovery >>> >>> Feedback welcome. >>> >>> #g >>> -- >
Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2012 13:44:43 UTC