- From: Miles, Simon <simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 11:37:48 +0000
- To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>, Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Tim, Stephan, Yes and no... Yes, I now know how to include the activity in the example, thanks. I suggest it would be good to include the activity in the examples for qualifiedDelegation and/or Delegation in the PROV-O document. But it presents a dilemma for the primer. Currently, PROV-O qualified relationships are introduced in the roles section. This seems a natural place, as roles are otherwise fairly simple annotations, so the explanation does not get too complex. Agents and responsibility, including actedOnBehalfOf, are introduced earlier in the primer, partly because in the roles section we discuss the roles of agents. Adding qualified relations to the agents section would not be great, as agents are a 'base' concept, and I want to avoid this section getting complex. I think the least worst option might be to keep the example using the binary actedOnBehalfOf relation, and change the PROV-N and PROV-XML to match. The binary PROV-O example actually better matches the text than the PROV-N and PROV-XML, as it is not said that the delegation was for a particular activity. Any opinions on this? Stephan - while invesitigating this, I noticed that while activity is an optional element of Delegation in the prov.xsd schema, it is shown as compulsory in the schema snippet in prov.xsd.html. thanks, Simon Dr Simon Miles Senior Lecturer, Department of Informatics Kings College London, WC2R 2LS, UK +44 (0)20 7848 1166 Evolutionary Testing of Autonomous Software Agents: http://eprints.dcs.kcl.ac.uk/1370/ ________________________________________ From: Timothy Lebo [lebot@rpi.edu] Sent: 06 November 2012 14:58 To: Miles, Simon Cc: Provenance Working Group Subject: Re: PROV-ISSUE-591: delegation PROV-O example missing activity reference [Primer] Simon, Does this resolve it? Thanks, Tim On Nov 1, 2012, at 4:24 PM, Stephan Zednik <zednis@rpi.edu> wrote: > I believe the relevant activity can be specified by the prov:hadActivity property in a qualified Delegation. > > ex:derek prov:qualifiedDelegation [ > a prov:Delegation ; > prov:agent ex:chartgen ; > prov:hadActivity ex:compose ; > ] . > > --Stephan > > On Nov 1, 2012, at 2:08 PM, "Miles, Simon" <simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk> wrote: > >> Hello PROV-O authors, >> >> I'm not sure how to resolve the issue below. Can you help? The examples for actedOnBehalfOf and Delegation in the PROV-O spec do not seem to explicitly link the actvity to the delegation. How should the PROV-O be written? >> >> thanks, >> Simon >> >> Dr Simon Miles >> Senior Lecturer, Department of Informatics >> Kings College London, WC2R 2LS, UK >> +44 (0)20 7848 1166 >> >> Efficient Multi-Granularity Service Composition: >> http://eprints.dcs.kcl.ac.uk/1396/ >> ________________________________________ >> From: Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker [sysbot+tracker@w3.org] >> Sent: 01 November 2012 20:05 >> To: public-prov-wg@w3.org >> Subject: PROV-ISSUE-591: delegation PROV-O example missing activity reference [Primer] >> >> PROV-ISSUE-591: delegation PROV-O example missing activity reference [Primer] >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/591 >> >> Raised by: Stephan Zednik >> On product: Primer >> >> The PROV-N example specifies that ex:derek was acting on behalf of ex:chartgen during the ex:compose activity. >> >> agent(ex:chartgen, >> [prov:type='prov:Organization', >> foaf:name="Chart Generators Inc"]) >> actedOnBehalfOf(ex:derek, ex:chartgen, ex:compose) >> >> This reference to ex:compose is not present in the PROV-O encoding of this same example. >> >> ex:derek prov:actedOnBehalfOf ex:chartgen . >> ex:chartgen a prov:Agent ; >> a prov:Organization ; >> foaf:name "Chart Generators Inc" . >> > > >
Received on Wednesday, 7 November 2012 11:38:49 UTC