- From: Graham Klyne <graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 09:53:35 +0000
- To: Tim Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- CC: W3C provenance WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>, Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
Done. Thanks. #g -- On 21/11/2012 13:44, Tim Lebo wrote: > > > Sent from my iPad > > On Nov 21, 2012, at 3:24, Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org> wrote: > >> >>> 2) >>> I am uncomfortable with the phrase "and by extension the resources it contains" in: >>> >>> "might indicate a provenance service providing information about that dataset, >>> and by extension the resources it contains:" >>> >>> since "void:Dataset 'containing' resources" is ill defined, and even if we >>> stated void:inDataset, the provenance of the dataset is not necessarily the >>> provenance of the resources that the dataset describes. >> >> Yes, it was probably an ill-chosen example, though it seemed like a good idea at the time to link to other metadata work. I'll see if I can think of something less controversial to use. > > > > I think the void example is fine, I would suggest to just remove the phrase : > >>> and by extension the resources it contains > > > > Tim > > >> >> #g >> -- >> >>> >>> On Nov 20, 2012, at 9:09 AM, Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org >>> <mailto:GK@ninebynine.org>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I had an action (but no issue) to expand the discussion of provenance service >>>> discovery to take account of prov:hasProvenanceService. I've done this, and >>>> added an example related to a VOiD dataset description. Revised text is at: >>>> >>>> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/tip/paq/prov-aq.html#provenance-service-discovery >>>> >>>> Feedback welcome. >>>> >>>> #g >>>> -- >> >
Received on Monday, 26 November 2012 14:19:42 UTC